Concerning the Jews and Their Comedies: Feces, Neuroses, and Subversities


– 29 October 2015 –

C. F. van Niekerk:

150708-van-NiekirkI had made up my mind to write no more this day either about the Jews or against them.  But since I learned that those miserable and accursed people do not cease to make their silly childish jokes all the time to lure to themselves even us—that is, the White historically Christian nations—I have published this little article.  Hopefully this will show them!


Some years ago I tried to watch the movie Borat.  It was so utterly depraved, so devoid of decency, I could not finish!

Borat, written and played by Sacha Baron Cohen, features the American adventures of fictitious Kazakh reporter Borat Sagdiyev, Borat’s producer Azamat Bagatov, and an orange pet chicken.

The movie begins in a fictitious town in Kazakhstan, where the poor hick natives are shown as vile, incestuous, anti-Semitic imbeciles whose livestock live with the villagers in their tiny hovels.  The villagers are basically Samboes for the amusement of Cohen’s people.

Americans get the same miserable treatment for the remainder of what I saw. Borat‘s producers set up just about every one of Borat’s encounters with regular people on false pretenses, saying that they were filming a documentary about a Belarussian’s experiences in the United States, or about helping women in third world countries, or similar lies. Those Jews and their lies!

In watching most of this movie, there were some genuinely funny parts.  But the horrors continually reared their ugly, deformed heads.

I survived (not without scars) some monstrously grotesque images, namely semi-nude images of Borat himself, homosexual men prancing around in a parade and hotel, graphic naked photos of Borat’s supposed son, scenes of naked Borat and his revoltingly obese naked producer running and fighting through a hotel convention. That last one almost did me in, and it chills me to this day. . . . But it was the scene where Borat makes fun of a Pentacostal church service, presumably without the raucus attendees wise to the gag, that pissed me off enough to turn the hideous miscreation off.  An abomination!


Borat humiliates the unsuspecting folks at a Southern dining club by subjecting them to a bag of shit, insults, and the presence of an obese black prostitute. White elites are the ‘butt’ of the joke. Wacka wacka.

And I never again watched a comedy made after 2006, not even on television. (Which is why the rest of my examples are so outdated.) I don’t think I could survive.  I hear the Nutless Wonders at work yammering about this Big Bang program all the time, and some guy named Sheldon all the time, but I remain proudly and stubbornly ignorant of whatever trash this must be! The Nutless Wonders don’t like me very much, but their ire is no loss to me!

Some common themes ran through Borat, namely:

  • Borat subverts the values of rural American people, particularly White Southerners, by demeaning their culture and deliberately hand-picking the most outrageous excesses of these people for comedic effect.
  • The Borat character continually exhibits neurotic obsessions about perverted sex and various toilet functions.

The Three Main Elements in Jewish Comedy

I point out these features not to review this piece of depredation, but to show that Borat features the elements of a particularly Jewish form of humor.

Jewish comedies almost always employ some form of subversion against society, some form of neurotic behavior, and crude humor based on sex or toilet functions.

The Kid From Spain

Some other years ago I caught another movie, this one from 1932, a pre-Code film called The Kid From Spain, starring Eddie Cantor.  It was a delight to watch!  Genuinely funny and witty, with startlingly racy footage of semi-nude Goldwyn girls who are probably all dead by now, and Cantor singing and dancing in blackface to avoid capture by thugs in Mexico. Very fun to watch!


But the humor was remarkably modern somehow. And why was that? Because it was Jewish!

From 1932 and before to the modern day, Jews have displayed a similar humor.  Eddie Cantor, the Marx Brothers, the Three Stooges, Jack Benny, Milton Berle, Lenny Bruce, Jackie Mason, Mel Brooks, Rodney Dangerfield, Woody Allen, Billy Crystal, Garry Shandling, Jerry Seinfeld, Ben Stiller, Adam Sandler, John Stewart, Sarah Silverman, and Sacha Baron Cohen.  It has only changed in its vulgarity.

So what made it Jewish?

For one thing, the humor featured the three things I just mentioned.

  • Cantor’s character subverted his college by sleeping in the girls dormitory, he subverted the Mexican authorities by sneaking into their country posing as a bullfighter, and he subverted the morals of his audience with the semi-nude girls and by appearing to have a romance with the dorm’s headmistress, among other things.
  • Cantor’s character suffers from a neurosis.  Whenever he hears a whistle, he panics and slaps people. It drives the plot.
  • Cantor’s character uses very minor scatological bathroom humor, but not even pre-Code movies had progressed to the level of base wit that we started to see in the sixties. But this type of humor is there. He makes use of sexual innuendo throughout the film, quite racy for its time, and he also makes a reference to a skin graft on his face removed from his buttocks.

Three Elements Explained in Mind-Numbing Detail


The subversion stems from Jewish identity with the common man against the forces of authority.  The subversion may take the form of corruption of the authorities, sneaking things past them, or it may simply mock them. No one is safe from this subversion, with nagging wives and the infamous Jewish mother frequent targets.  Even God isn’t immune, with George Burns making fun of our Creator in three different Oh God! movies.


The neurosis often takes the form of obsessive compulsive disorder, anxiety, or paranoia.  The characters in Seinfeld frequently suffered from all of these psychological issues, particularly obsession and anxiety over petty matters.  The Seinfeld characters also become more sociopathic over time, displaying a remarkable lack of concern for the pain and misfortune of others.

Jason Alexander as George Costanza, Julia Louis-Dreyfus as Elaine Benes, Michael Richards as Kramer and Jerry Seinfeld as Jerry Seinfeld in NBC's Seinfeld.

Seinfeld constantly made use of typically Jewish humor, particularly of neuroses like OCD and paranoia. Scatological and sex obsession is there, too, as is subversion of bourgeois conventions and morals.


The sex and toilet humor deserves particular attention, because it remains so especially Jewish in style.  It has also infected non-Jewish comedy to an ever-growing extent, with this crude humor appearing in children’s comedies like Shrek and The Lion King.  How many times do we have to see the short squeaky-voiced sarcastic creature and the big, stupid ass-obsessed creature in the kid’s movies?

This type of comedy is obsessed with crude sex, digestive body functions, and private body parts.  Monkeys pitching turds at the public in a zoo have the same level of sophistication. (Of course, monkeys doing anything is inherently funny, perhaps especially when they throw feces. But even toddlers would think this is funny.  It is cheap, base humor!)

Scatological Humor, But Beware the Haters

William Pierce, not a big fan of Jews, had some things to say about Jewish scatological humor.  I understand that it is impossible for modern people to read the horrible passages below and not to think of the horrors of the Nazis and World War II. Nor would one wish to excuse Pierce for this text.  I should point out, though, that Pierce used violent and crude language throughout his career: he was not a man to say “manure” when he meant “shit”. This kind of language was very common in the late 20th century. This of course doesn’t justify what follows, but it may help the reader to comprehend what is being written here, however unfortunate and hurtful his words and attitudes might be to the tender sympathies of our innocent public.  It sickens me and should sicken everyone!


DiabolusDear reader forget the pitiful contorsions of this emasculated translater. Just go for the text, and the gist of it. Who cares for politically correctness? AAARGH!)

Back to C. F. van Niekerk:

150708-van-NiekirkHere’s what Pierce had to say, from an audio address on 14 April 2001 called “Shocking Differences”:

The school I at­tended was in one of Dal­las’ wealth­ier sub­urbs, and there were a num­ber of Jews in the school. What I and sev­eral of my class­mates no­ticed about the Jews was their uniquely Jew­ish sense of humor. One doesn’t ex­pect much del­i­cacy in the jokes told by 14-year-olds, of course, but the thing that made the jokes that ap­pealed es­pe­cially to the Jews stand out was their scat­o­log­i­cal con­tent. Nearly every Jew­ish joke in­volved ex­cre­ment in one way or an­other. As I said, this Jew­ish ten­dency was so pro­nounced that I and my Gen­tile class­mates no­ticed it and com­mented on it, even though we didn’t un­der­stand it. And it wasn’t that we had an ex­cep­tion­ally large num­ber of bud­ding Howard Sterns among our Jew­ish class­mates. The in­cli­na­tion to­ward scat­ol­ogy is a gen­eral Jew­ish char­ac­ter­is­tic. Jews them­selves, in­clud­ing Jew­ish psy­chol­o­gists, have com­mented on this Jew­ish trait often, ex­plain­ing it in terms of the col­lec­tive Jew­ish ex­pe­ri­ence through­out his­tory. It is real, and it is quite no­tice­able. . . .

. . . I don’t watch MTV my­self, and I sus­pect that most White par­ents of teenaged girls, even very lib­eral and trendy par­ents, also don’t pay at­ten­tion to what their daugh­ters are being in­doc­tri­nated with by Sum­ner Red­stone’s MTV. An ex­am­ple of which I re­cently be­came aware was brought to my at­ten­tion by the fil­ing just last week of a law­suit against MTV in Los An­ge­les Su­pe­rior Court. Let me give you the de­tails: three months ago, on Jan­u­ary 21, MTV was tap­ing a pilot for a new show called Dude, This Sucks. Some teenaged girls were vis­it­ing the stu­dio dur­ing the tap­ing. A stu­dio em­ployee in­structed them to stand on the stage in a cer­tain place for a part of the show in which a pair of per­form­ers known as the “Shower Rangers” were to go through their rou­tine. The girls were not told what the per­for­mance would be or how they would be in­volved in it.

The “Shower Rangers” were two men dressed in Boy Scout uni­forms. They came on stage, turned their backs to the cam­era and to the teenaged spec­ta­tors on the stage, dropped their trousers, bent over, and let fly with a shower of semi-liq­uid feces, spat­ter­ing the un­sus­pect­ing girls from head to foot. Ap­par­ently they had dosed them­selves with a pow­er­ful lax­a­tive prior to the per­for­mance.


Anthropomorphic feces. An innovation of Jewish humor in South Park.

To Jews, in­clud­ing bil­lion­aire Jew­ish media moguls like the owner of CBS and MTV, Sum­ner Red­stone, this sort of thing is hi­lar­i­ously funny. It’s their idea of humor. Un­for­tu­nately for MTV, how­ever, the girls who were sprayed by MTV’s “Shower Rangers” weren’t amused, nor were their par­ents. Last week two of the girls sued. One of them told the court:

We were hav­ing a good time until the sec­ond act of Dude, This Sucks went on. All of a sud­den I was smelling some­thing dis­gust­ing, and I started to gag. I looked around at my friends. They were cov­ered in some­thing. As I looked down at my­self I re­al­ized that I was too.

An­other of the plain­tiffs, 14-year-old Kelly Sloat, spoke of the hu­mil­i­a­tion the girls felt when they re­turned to school:

Every­one knew about it, even some of the teach­ers. Most of the kids were crack­ing jokes or wouldn’t come near us be­cause, even though we washed off the feces, they said we smelled. I will never, ever for­get what a hor­ri­ble ex­pe­ri­ence this was.

The girls’ law­suit charges MTV with “in­flic­tion of emo­tional dis­tress, neg­li­gence, and bat­tery. . . .

. . . And if you’ve been pay­ing any at­ten­tion at all to the trends in en­ter­tain­ment for teens, you’ll un­der­stand that there’s noth­ing ex­cep­tional about the “Shower Rangers.” They are just one more step in the di­rec­tion the Jews have been going all along: not just Sum­ner Red­stone, but all of them, from the time they first began tak­ing over con­trol of our en­ter­tain­ment media.

In the 1930s Gen­tile lead­ers, most of them Chris­tians, were able to threaten Jews ef­fec­tively with boy­cotts if they vi­o­lated stan­dards of de­cency. One of the most ef­fec­tive lead­ers of this ef­fort was Joseph Breen, who helped es­tab­lish the Pro­duc­tion Code for Hol­ly­wood in 1934. Breen knew ex­actly what he was up against. Of Jew­ish film­mak­ers Breen wrote in 1932:

These lousy Jews … are sim­ply a vile bunch of peo­ple with no re­spect for any­thing but the mak­ing of money…. These Jews seem to think of noth­ing but money-mak­ing and sex­ual in­dul­gence…. [They] are the men and women who de­cide what the film fare of the na­tion is to be.

The Pro­duc­tion Code con­strained the Jews for a cou­ple of decades, but with the ad­vent of tele­vi­sion the Jews gained far more in­flu­ence over pub­lic at­ti­tudes and be­hav­ior than the churches had. The Jews could safely ig­nore the Code, and in the 1960s they began push­ing again in the same di­rec­tion Sum­ner Red­stone is still push­ing with the “Shower Rangers.”

So you see, Jews re­ally are dif­fer­ent. They’re not just like us any more than the Chi­nese are. And let me tell you some­thing: I and a lot of other White Amer­i­cans have had just about as much of the Chi­nese and the Jews and the Blacks and the rest of the mul­ti­cul­tural filth here as we will tol­er­ate. We’ve been pushed about as far as we’re will­ing to let our­selves be pushed. We want our coun­try back, and we in­tend to take it back, and if a lot of soc­cer moms and yup­pies and Po­lit­i­cally Cor­rect jour­nal­ists who can’t un­der­stand that get in the way, they’re going to be hurt.

You tell ’em, William Pierce! Of course, he’s dead now, so the yuppies and soccer moms and other lemmings out there can continue to mindlessly consume without fear from that scary hater!

It was this crude humor that Pierce describes that makes Borat so unstomachable, and today Jewish humor is adopting vulgarity and primitive sarcasm so thoroughly that there is little room for cleverness, wit, or subtlety.  It is primitive! And it’s really not that funny. When the shock value wears off this humor is simply boring and contemptible.  I’m thinking Sarah Silverman here.  And we thought you Jews were so brilliant!

Other Features in Jewish Humor

Of course there are other features commonly found in Jewish humor apart from these three things.  These other features, though, can be found in the typical humor of other peoples, though the styles will differ.

As just mentioned, sarcasm plays a prominent role in Jewish humor.  But it’s like spice: a little goes a long way.  Frequently Jews like to use a little too much, particularly with their political humor, à la Jon Stewart.

The Jewish humor is often self-deprecating.  Wimpy or otherwise flawed or abnormal people are favorite protagonists, and these characters frequently make fun of, or even celebrate, their own weaknesses.  Often the plot is driven by the underdogs trying to subvert the elites or the cool people. (Subversion once again!) Think Revenge of the Nerds (though I couldn’t find any Jews connected to that movie so I should have found a different example but didn’t bother so now my argument is seriously undermined. The trouble is, much of modern non-Jewish humor has essentially become Jewish).  A less famous, but more Jewish, example would be 2003’s National Lampoon’s Barely Legal.


The wimpy Jewish kid in American Pie, another movie fraught with Jewish humor.

Sometimes there is a resignation in Jewish humor, even pessimism, where sadness and failure are part of life and one can find the humor in them.  Sometimes it’s fun to watch the underdog get kicked around for a while.  Like Al Bundy in Married with Children, another non-Jewish show as far as I can tell.

Public service humor, where the hags in the audience shriek ‘Whooooooooo-ooo!’ but nobody laughs. Yeah, Ms. feminist Comedienne, everyone hates the global warming deniers. But you’re not funny. (I guess, after thinking about it, that this type of humor isn’t peculiar to Jewish comedy. I am compelled, though, to gripe for a moment about the not-funny, annoying activist humor that female comedians seem to employ so fondly. Sarcastic bitching is what it is! Nothing more! But not Jewish, I guess. Damn.)

Pre-Jewish Comedy

Nowadays Jewish humor has so thoroughly taken over that modern-day imbeciles can no longer even understand pre-Jewish humor.

The Grandpa humor found in old John Wayne movies, where men frequently brawled with each other for laughs, or where women got spanked like children, would draw blank or contemptuous stares from the smartphone generation.  (See McLintock! for a fine example of this Grandpa humor.)

Bob Hope is perhaps the prime example of pre-Jewish humor.  Hope’s feel-good, comfortable humor now seems utterly lame, even to me who tends to appreciate the old ways.


Poor Bob Hope. His comedy is too safe to be funny anymore.

What Jewish Humor is Not

Jews, in their comedies, almost never pick the sides of an elite at the expense of the underdogs, even if in reality the Jews are now the elites. The whole world has become the Island of Misfit Toys in Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer, but the misfits still consider themselves to be misfits at the expense of the normal people, the normal people being traditional White Christians.

If the humor favors the normal and seemingly privileged elites over the underdogs, then it isn’t Jewish.

What is Humor, Anyway?

Humor is such an unfunny word. It sounds like a medical procedure performed by a frowning, stodgy doctor with cold hands. I’ve used that word “humor” just about interchangeably with “comedy” in this article, but comedy is more of a type of humor, one performed. “Funny-ness” would be a better word, but it sounds like something an idiot would say.

In any case, what makes something funny?

Of course, humor is an art rather than a science, so it’s difficult to pin down a definition.

But from what I can tell, humor is a type of cognitive lubricant.  Our minds apply it automatically to the unexpected or the unusual.

We find things to be funny that, in their extremes, would cause us (or others) fear, shock, disgust, worry, or other forms of discomfort.  Or even death. Humor helps us to deal with things that we think deep-down might threaten us.

It’s funny when other people get hurt. Why? Because it didn’t happen to us! If the injured person died, most decent people wouldn’t find it to be funny, though a barbarian probably would.  The cheaper life gets, the crueler the humor.

Freaks are funny, especially harmless ones. Why? Because we aren’t the freak! We see a range of freaks all the time. Many of us are freaks in some way or another. But one guy’s normal is another guy’s freakishness, and we can enjoy the other’s misfortune because it isn’t ours. Dwarfs and the mentally retarded, for instance, are harmless freaks who are commonly considered to be funny, however much the nannies in charge today scold us for it.  But too much freakishness, like people with their faces melted off, becomes frightening or creepy.

Surprises are funny. Why? Because we survived the shock without damage.  Of course, when the surprises happen to others, it is just like when others get hurt. Better them than us!

We seem to find cleverness to be funny. I guess because it is so rare. But if it’s too clever, then we will be too stupid to get it. Then we’ll feel threatened and attack.

There is a blurry line between what is funny and what is threatening, creepy, disgusting, or insulting. That is where the art comes in because that line is different for everyone and it varies from culture to culture.


Our humor is little more than a caveman’s coping mechanism for a short and uncertain life. And the more barbarous the times, the more barbarous the humor.

Bowell- and Mother-Obsessed Sigmund Freud

Sigmund Freud broke down human psychology into various obsessions with bowel movements, vulgar sexual impulses towards one’s parents, and neurotic obsessions and anxieties about self control.  Just like Jewish humor!  Hmmm.

Freud must have believed that his own demented Jewish mind represented the minds of the rest of humanity.  But his warped cognitions do seem to apply to the rest of his people.

We White Christians must have driven the Jews collectively mad when when we locked them inside their walled ghettos and forced them to work as pawnbrokers for 500 years.

The Jews are all insane. Doubtlessly, they would secretly admit it.


Now tell me whether the Jews do not have every reason to be the enemies of us accursed Goyim, to curse us and to strive for our final, complete, and eternal ruin!

Previous Post
Leave a comment


  1. I am an unapologetic Marx Bros fan, they were funny.

    Shows like Seinfeld I watch from the point of view that these characters are examples of how not to act! Now that I think about it, I watch most tv shows from that pov.

    Does it seem odd that a people with such a high average IQ would create such low brow products as Hollywood and tv? That their humor would be elementary school level?

    I think either they are degenerate as a result of their overt rejection of Christ, given over to their lusts in Biblical terminology, or simply so nihilistic that they can’t comprehend striving for something higher. Maybe those are the same things.


    • “I think either they are degenerate as a result of their overt rejection of Christ, given over to their lusts in Biblical terminology, or simply so nihilistic that they can’t comprehend striving for something higher. Maybe those are the same things.”

      I suspect you’re right.

      Their humor wasn’t always so degenerate as it is now. At least it’s difficult for me to believe that, behind closed doors, Jews from 100 years ago were as nasty as they are today. And I suspect that today’s ultra-Orthodox Jews would especially disdain the low-brow media produced by their liberal brethren.


      • Somebody wondered why orthodox jews, who are anti-abortion, are never protesting with Christians and are not criticising their secular jewish counterparts for their support of abortion. Its a good question, but its naive. Orthodox jews are jews first and while they are anti-abortion on general principle and especially for jews (maybe primarily or only for jews) they are just as concerned with what’s ‘good for the jews’. So, they may disdain the degenerate crap that their brethren sell, but they just don’t watch it. They aren’t going to do anything to hurt secular jews.

        On a related note, have you heard of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations?

        Liked by 1 person

      • I wouldn’t expect that orthodox Jews would form alliances with non-Jews or protest our destruction. They won’t even walk on the same side of the street as Western women.

        I wouldn’t expect any Jews to do anything other than advance their own interests. I blame our peoples for letting them do it at our expense! If we can ever fix the problem with our people, then the problem with the Jewish influence in this country is nothing.

        You’ve linked to the COPOMAJO site at NC Links, I think. It gives a nice graphic indication of the Jewish groups that are active around the world and how they are working together, which makes sense. Not sure if there is something else I’m missing?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

  • October 2015
    S M T W T F S
    « Sep   Nov »
%d bloggers like this: