No Police for BLM Riots, A Police State for Gaza War Protests

– 26 April 2024 –

C. F. van Niekerk:

So in a week’s time, these university Gaza War protests have spread from Columbia University in New York to other Ivy League schools and then all across the country, where Leftist protesters are occupying sites to set up long-term tent zones to screech and whine 24/7 against the white “Nazi” aggression of Israel, who are genociding the non-white, oppressed-class Palestinians of Gaza.

The liberal elites, unlike during the barely restrained George Floyd riots of 2020, have now made heavy use of the police, who have obediently broken up these protest camps before they can get established; they’re quelling the dissent, it seems. The elite university leadership, many of them Jewish and all of them liberal, people who had stood in lockstep to showcase their support for BLM and to condemn the very existence of police just four years ago, have variously denounced today’s protesters as “anti-Semites” and have threatened them with expulsion and even imprisonment. Meanwhile, the police, who meekly “took their knees” in 2020 and made themselves impotent before black criminality, pant at their masters’ orders and leap in (like the mindless bulldogs that they are) to throw wayward professors and their skanky students to the ground. It’s okay to protest and riot against white civilization, but criticizing Jews is a whole other story!

[Harvard President Alan Garber, who is himself Jewish, treads carefully with these protesters while trying to shut them down.]

Then we have the so-called conservatives. Naturally they have to take the opposite position of the Leftist protesters. But what does that look like? These conservatives either ideologically support Israel as our “greatest ally” in the Middle East, or they religiously support modern Israel and Jews as “God’s Chosen People,” who, when all is said and done, can do no wrong in their eyes. In both cases, the conservatives unite even more firmly behind the Jews and Israel in order to show their greater loyalty to Jewish concerns than these disloyal liberals and “terrorists” who—of course—they also call “Nazis.” Hamas is evil, the Jews are good, and if there are unfortunate civilian casualties, it’s because Hamas is using them as human shields. At least that’s how the narrative goes.

[John Hagee is like a cartoon version of an American Christian Zionist, like a blob man out of Southpark. Does he ever talk about our Lord, or does he only promote Zionist Israel? Let’s see which he talks about first.]

The situation gets even more absurd and confusing when we look at who is funding these Leftist anti-Gaza protests. Most notoriously, according to an article in The New York Post anyway, we have George Soros’ Open Society Foundation dumping piles of money on these groups, and other organizations are doing the same, including the Rockefeller Foundation, some retired Wall-Street banker Felice Gelman, and another group called WESPAC, which is run by Howard Horowitz. With the exception of the Rockefeller Foundation (which has sunk its tentacles into subversive projects for decades), each of these named groups is run by Jews. How strange that Jews would fund these supposed anti-Semites so they can riot against the Gaza War!

[George Soros is Jewish, so why is his foundation funding Gaza war protesters?]

So, to boil down the various sides here:

We have Jewish-funded anti-Israel protests erupting around the country to stop the “Nazis” in Zionist Israel and in “fascist” America.

We also have Jewish groups and liberals (many of them Jews) aggressively trying to stomp out these “Nazi” and anti-Semitic protests.

And we also have conservative leaders and groups trying to outdo their liberal equivalents by more aggressively shutting down the “Nazi” protests, while they meanwhile call the liberals “Nazis” for not taking a tough stand against the vocal, anti-Israeli elements of their base.

And all of this is happening in the United States of America, a country that should have nothing to do with an internal ethnic war in modern Israel between the Zionist Jews and the Hamas resistance in the Gaza Strip.

What are we to make of all this mess?

The first thing to take away from the situation is that Jews basically control the discourse in America. They call the shots to both liberals and conservatives all the way from the “grass-roots” bases to the swine who occupy seats in office (including both Trump and Biden), to all the major media outlets, and to all the large corporations.

Every issue that gets drummed up in America these days, by elite dictate, must be tied to some dogmatic political ideology that amounts to a secular religion, and then every conflict must be made into an ideological crusade against an existential evil, i. e., against “Naziism.”

[Everyone who is against you must be a Nazi. Why else would they oppose you?]

This notion of moral crusading is so deeply embedded in Western discourse today that it’s hard for Westerners to imagine that conflicts, only a hundred years ago, were not these all-or-nothing, life-and-death struggles against good and evil. At one time, in most cases, conflicts were simply about competing interests between two self-interested parties, and therefore the conflicts could be fought and resolved in a limited manner. But the Jews don’t fight that way, and they don’t want their proxies to fight that way, either! Every struggle, even if it’s about the price of Corn Flakes, must be life and death, good and evil, right and wrong!

The second thing to take away from this chaos is that the Jews are not united. There are several competing groups within Judaism, and their conflicts are playing out through their proxies in America because Jews have come to collectively control, more or less, the United States in particular, and by extension, the entire West.

[Religious and secular Jews, presumably, having an argument in Israel. Jews like to argue. It’s what they do best.]

We can categorize the Jews into two major factions in how they handle the world and each other: the nationalists and internationalists. The nationalist Jews (that is, nationalist for Zionism), exemplified by Benjamin Netanyahu, tend to favor a more militaristic, direct approach to accomplishing their goals. They have militant zeal, like spiders rushing across their webs to wrap up their tangled prey. The internationalist Jews, exemplified by George Soros, tend to take a more long-term globalist approach that continues to use indirect manipulation to accomplish their collective goals. The left-wingers want to keep spinning their webs in the shadows. But both sides support Israel.

Because the United States is largely controlled by these Jewish factions, our internal politics are playing out in ways that reflect the conflict between these two major sides within Judaism. Liberals like Barrack Obama and Joe Biden favor the approach and policies of the international Jews, while conservatives like Donald Trump and this awful Speaker of the House Mike Johnson favor the nationalist Jews.

[Christian Zionist weirdos, with Mike Johnson on the right. Suckers or traitors? It doesn’t matter, the results are the same.]

In times when Jewish interests for the United States are aligned on both the right and left, both political parties who supposedly hate each other magically turn into bipartisan allies. Congress passes bill at like 366 to 58, or even more lopsided than that. And wherever divide-and-rule professional wresting is preferred by the masters, then we have hysterical political theatrics while everything important keeps moving the same way.

For example, the 2020 BLM riots served national Jewish interests because the movement further weakened what they view as white supremacy, so while plenty of people bent over backward to show BLM support, nobody in high office, even Donald Trump, dared to stop the protests and riots, even during a so-called pandemic where everyone else had to wear masks and huddle inside their houses. Compare that situation with today, where probably 75% or more of American Jews don’t like Benjamin Netanyahu or his conduct in the Israeli-Gazi war. But these same Jews, as well as their lackey Christian Zionists, are very concerned about the ongoing anti-Israel protests, that it could breed anti-Semitism, so the police fall over themselves to stomp out the supposed riots. It’s a divided situation today for American Jews.

So why are there some Jews and Jewish groups in America who support these anti-Israeli protests?

[Most American Jews don’t like Benjamin Netanyahu and many of them oppose the conduct of the war in Gaza.]

That brings me to the third idea to take away from these reactions to the Gaza War protesters: the system is using these protests for other purposes.

Like so many other issues today, much of the political reaction to the Gaza War protests is a mere foil to achieve other ends.

It’s hard to say for certain, but these protests can potentially drive changes in the United States that serve Jewish interests.

First, the protests generate considerable bi-partisan support, even among regular people, for restrictions on supposed hate speech, especially against anti-Semitism. This so-called hate speech is a problem for Jewish elites because more and more people, especially young people, are figuring out that the Jews are running things, that their rule has ruined the country, and that their power now threatens to destroy it. Jewish elites see trouble ahead, and they want speech restrictions to help thwart any potential uprising. A few states have already passed restrictions on speech that they define as anti-Semitic. If these protests continue, or especially if they escalate, then restrictions on speech that the Jews don’t like can gain more acceptance. “Hate speech isn’t free speech!“

[Free speech and hate speech are what the system says they are. And what is anyone going to do about it?]

Second, these Leftist agitators can be used, if needed, against Donald Trump during the 2024 election campaign and afterward. For whatever reason, the Jews in America are both terrified and enraged by Donald Trump as president. He has consistently upheld the Jewish nationalist, pro-Netanyahu side, but this is a country where internationalist Jews hold the upper hand. I suspect that the system fears Donald Trump because he’s a reckless, narcissistic wild card and because he has energized American nationalists and patriots who might one day reverse Jewish societal engineering, and who might even turn on the Jews themselves.

Third, these protesters can be energized even further to help destroy the United States as a country, if desired. We’ve already seen how many of them, interestingly enough, equate the American government with the Israeli government that is fighting the Gaza War. “Death to America!” Globalists want a different kind of America, a weaker America, whether it exists in one piece or it’s broken into fragments. The addled Gaza War protesters, when united with the millions of resentful foreigners who have magically flooded into every city in America, will have a fighting chance to demolish whatever remains of white America.

[An insurance policy for the Jewish elites against American nationalism.]

In mentioning the significance of the 2024 election, it may sound like I place great weight on its outcome. I really don’t. The outcome of the election isn’t nearly as important as the forces unleashed by the ongoing election process. It doesn’t really much matter which man is holding office. Both major geriatric candidates support similar policies that end up being terrible for the real American people. Both sides, despite all of the polarized programming, ultimately serve these Jewish elites. We’ve already seen this, even with Trump’s actions (if not his words) in his first term, despite all the hair-ripping hysteria and deranged insanity.

If we view all this mess and drama as political theater—or if you will, like professional wrestling—then it’s the reaction of the gullible audience that really holds the key! How do they react to the events leading up to the main event? How much “heat” is being generated?

[The “Biggest Wrestlemania Match of All-Time,” and all I got was this lousy Snickers ad.]

In professional wrestling, the goal is to keep people tuned in, hyped up, and buying tickets and pay-per-view. (Does pay-per-view still exist?) In the electoral charade, the goal is to herd the people into doing some other thing in addition to buying stuff. What that “some other thing” may be for 2024 is pretty hard to tell.

Are the polyglot of peoples in America supposed to rise up and start killing each other in a civil war? There is predictive programming to support that idea. Or are they supposed to mindlessly unite as a polyglot “people” in order to die by the millions fighting a war against the despotic tyrannies of China and Russia who hate butt sex? Or both?

Or will this hyper-screechy 2024 drama turn out as just another melodramatic side event in the rotting national circus, and then everything just keeps creeping along the same sad, dismal path that we’ve seen for the past several decades?

We’ll see, I guess.

[Is it time to get off this ride yet?]
Leave a comment
by Janus on 26 April 2024  •  Permalink
Posted in C. F. van Niekerk
Tagged , , ,

Posted by Janus on 26 April 2024

https://finesetinitia.wordpress.com/2024/04/26/no-police-for-blm-riots-a-police-state-for-gaza-war-protests/

The Western Mind-Virus Infects the Urban Youths of the Nation of Georgia

– 19 April 2024 –

C. F. van Niekerk:

Me, the True Me

“Oh, how we youthful oppressed
yearn to be free,
Just like the Brits and the Yankees
over the sea!

“I flee from the Russkies,
who just won’t let me be me,
the true me,
So that I can reroute my urethra
to change how I pee!

“Only when people must call me “shim”
will I ever be free!”
Only with the free and open West
can I ever know me,
the true me!”
— The phone-addled retards of Tblisi and in every other world city

It’s a tiresome story that we’ve seen across the world for more than twenty tedious years: if the ruling—typically conservative—government won’t get with the “rules-based,” “democratic” program, the media and the NGO’s send several thousand emotionalized, porn-addled youth into the streets to throw public fits for days with English-language signs.

[Who are they appealing to with their English-language signs?]

If you can’t subvert the leaders to betray their own nations, then try to shame them and scare them into resigning for the sake of “peace.” Conservatives especially tend to fall for this nonsense every time. They are jellyfish.

This is what is happening in the nation of Georgia right now.

Via RT.com:

The Georgian parliament adopted a controversial ‘foreign agents’ bill in its first reading on Wednesday, despite opposition protests and warnings from the EU that the legislation could jeopardize the country’s ambitions to join the bloc.   

The legislation, officially known as the bill ‘On the Transparency of Foreign Influence’, was backed by 83 members of the 150-member chamber. The opposition boycotted the vote. Several dissenting MPs were expelled from the chamber after becoming unruly during the hearing.

Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze, is adamant that the ruling party will not cave in to foreign and domestic pressure. Speaking on Wednesday, Kobakhidze rejected criticism of the bill, arguing it would actually bring Georgia closer to the EU by making the country more transparent.

Oooh, so clever! And such zingers always work so well, too! The conservative (if that’s a useful assessment here) adopts the rhetoric and moral premises of the Left to disarm their arguments! Hmph!

[Who feeds these crowds? Who pays for the portable toilets? These riots are productions.]

Georgian President Salome Zourabichvili, however, has condemned the outcome of the vote, vowing to veto the legislation altogether, should it pass the second and third readings. The president claims the bill jeopardizes Georgia’s EU aspirations and imposes “obstacles” to fair elections in the country. 

“I’m going to veto this law, as I’m vetoing all the other laws… that go against the recommendations of the European Union,” Zourabichvili told the BBC. She admitted that her veto would likely be overridden by the parliament, but insisted that the step was necessary to express the “voice of people.”

[. . .]

…The new attempt to pass it has already faced similar trouble, including street protests, a mass brawl on the parliament floor, and mounting criticism from the West. The EU’s top diplomat, Josep Borrell, has warned that the adoption of the bill could “compromise Georgia’s EU path.”

Georgia is an Orthodox Christian, socially conservative country, excepting the influential cosmopolitans who flit back and forth from Tblisi to visit places like Paris and New York. Of course, there are also the de-evolving, infertile cretins of the phone generations, the worst of them, like the upper crust, pulled into the urban drain of Tblisi and the universities. None of these groups has a natural resistance to the mind virus of the West.

The ruling party in Georgia is called Georgian Dream. They are vaguely conservative, kind of religious, sort of pro-Europe, ostensibly anti-Russian, limply anti-homo, and overall nothing very emphatically. What they really represent is everyone who doesn’t like the aggressively pro-Western nutcases who had backed the very cruel and corrupt former president Mikheil Sackofshi-, whoops! I mean Saakashvili!

Western-educated Mikheil Saakashvili magically sprang into the presidency of Georgia like a morning dandelion after one of the world’s first “color revolutions,” called the “Rose Revolution” (so like a morning rose bloom, I guess) because some Western agent walzed into their parliament sweeping around in circles with a bouquet of red roses as his dancing partner.

(These global Leftists like to do these very visual artsy things that end up sticking in people’s heads, the visual equivalent of earworm commercial jingles. It’s part of the psyop. Like the spiky Covid ball. Or that pretty Ukrainian lady’s braid on top of her head. Get an image to stick in the public’s head, and they will somehow become enslaved to it. Operant conditioning. Mind fuckery, is what it really is! Maybe I’ll write an article about that some time, but I’m running out of time here! Anyway…)

[The unusual hairbraid and the Covid ball, hammered through repetition, are examples of props for psychological conditioning.]

The Georgians hated Saakashvili! His government was very corrupt and thuggish. They jailed thousands of people and gave them show trials; in a short time, they had the fifth highest incarceration rate in the world. Maybe that wasn’t so bad, but the arrests could be arbitrary, and a lot of these victims were political opponents, I guess. Meanwhile, Saakashvili’s party opened up the country to even more foreign “investors” and NGO’s, who enriched a few but did little for anyone else except to manipulate them. Really though, as far as the Georgian people are concerned, the unforgivable thing Saakashvili did was lose Abkhazia and South Ossetia to Russia in the 2008 Russo-Georgian War. They blame him for the whole mess, and that’s why they sentenced him to jail.

So after Saakashvili lost his election, the Georgia Dream party took over and has held a majority ever since. But they are a schizophrenic party, mainly existing to oppose the Saakashvili people, as far as I can tell. For instance, their current president, a French-born-and-raised Georgian woman named Salome Zourabichvili, who is the typical Western-educated liberal, was elected in 2018 with Georgia Dream backing. She turned on them in 2020 over the all-too-typical election disputes (needed to undermine the legitimacy of a party that isn’t gay enough), and she is a full-on Western zio-globalist-butt-sex liberal of the Justin Trudeau variety. People seem to like her personally for whatever reason, but when she tried to form a Western-style Leftist party, it tanked like a rotten potater. The main opposition bloc, which is led by Saakashvili’s former party, the United National Movement, (but I guess now lumped under an international coalition under the EU’s European People’s Party) is ostensibly center-right in comparison with Georgia Dream. But even the United National Movement is schizophrenic: supposedly pro-Christian, socially conservative but aggressively pro-European and, of course, vehemently anti-Russian. What’s the difference between these parties, really? Matters of degree? Personalities? Styles?

[“A Georgian lawmaker (right) punched a rival politician in the face over the government’s re-introduction of a controversial ‘foreign influence’ bill.” So much whipped-up drama over having their foreign donors exposed.]

So politics in Georgia is hard to pin down. It all seems to boil down to what level of anti-Russian and pro-European stance the political party maintains, but to win elections, every party must be anti-Russia and pro-EU/NATO. Nothing else really seems to matter: all the main parties are amorphously conservative but hazily liberal, vaguely globalist and androgynously nationalist or patriotic.

I read an interesting article that broke down a poll of the political persuasions of the Georgian public. It was machine-translated but quite coherent:

Via LinkedIn, of all places:

The respondents participating in the research evaluated how much they agree with the provisions in the Georgian popular and media discourse regarding the European Union and Russia. As a result of statistical processing of collected data , 6 main groups were selected: pragmatists, conservatives, liberals, nationalists, Euro-nihilists and anti-Europeans.

The group of pragmatists has the highest support for joining the European Union. However, this trend is neither due to the support of European values ​​nor to the feeling of Europeanness in general. The average statistical member of this group does not have a special connection with either Europe or Russia at the ideological-value level. Instead, they have a strong desire to belong to a strong political-economic union. Pragmatists give a high, not infrequently, even exaggerated assessment of the potential benefits that Georgia can receive from EU membership. On the other hand, in this group, the factors that are evaluated as threatening by other groups are less important, therefore, they cannot weaken the positive attitude towards the European Union among the pragmatists. The group actively defends its position regarding the “European choice” even when given a hypothetical situation in which the Georgian Orthodox Church no longer supports European integration. It should be noted that pragmatists do not have intense nostalgia for the Soviet Union, moreover, they think that only those people who miss the Soviet Union will oppose Georgia’s joining the European Union.

Conservatives also passionately support Georgia’s EU membership and, at first glance, have a lot in common with the group of pragmatists discussed above. However, the main feature that differentiates conservatives from pragmatists is the assessment of the potential benefits of joining the European Union as relatively low, and the threats as high risks. The position of the Georgian Orthodox Church has more or less influence on the value choice of conservatives. Members of this group share the opinion that common faith brings Russia and Georgia closer. On the other hand, they see a significant difference between European and Georgian culture, and they consider only the “removal” of what does not contradict Georgian traditions to be accepted. Conservatives actively support the idea of ​​the country declaring neutrality, as they consider it a guarantee of the country’s security. For this group, it is unacceptable for Georgia to join the Eurasian Union, although they have a strong desire to “normalize” Georgia’s relations with Russia.

Liberals, although they occupy the 3rd place in terms of the level of support for the European Union, they have the strongest feeling of “Europeanness” compared to other groups. At the same time, it is important that they are against having any connection with Russia at the political level, because for the liberals, Russia is not one of the neighbors, but an aggressor that has occupied the country’s territories. Members of this group believe that Georgians are not yet fully European, although they do not see this as a distant prospect. It should be noted that among the members of the group there is clearly an excess of young adults who have access to relevant information related to the European Union and often have direct contact with it. All this ensures that they are an informed group of citizens who can more adequately evaluate the pros and cons of European Union membership. Therefore, compared to the previous groups, the liberals are modest in their support for European integration, however, we can assume that in the long term they will maintain a stable position and not deviate from the chosen path. It is also worth noting that liberals try to separate themselves from the rest of society, which does not share their position.

[Mushrooms will grow anywhere in the right conditions, namely darkness and rot. (Notice how the police outnumber the freaks in this picture though. Georgia has a long way to go to become fully “European!”)]

Nationalists also express a strong desire for Georgia to become a member of the European Union. However, their enthusiasm is tempered by the fear that Europe is threatening their national identity. Among these potential threats, which could lead to the “loss of Georgia”, the marriage of same-sex couples is on the first place, as the latter is considered a self-enforced regulation by the European Union. The rights of the LGBT community are a burning issue among pragmatists and conservatives, but among nationalist groups, the topic provokes hatred and violence. The members of the mentioned group oppose the idea of ​​equating Georgianness and Europeanness with each other. They believe that Georgia belongs neither to Europe nor to Asia, but represents a separate, unique category. The nationalists do not consider Russia a reliable partner, but they want to stabilize the relations between the two countries and enjoy all the benefits that can accompany the stabilized relations.

Euro-nihilists are characterized by a lower level of support for the European Union compared to the groups discussed above. This group considers the prospect of European integration to be unrealistic. Euro-nihilists do not consider themselves Europeans and see an insurmountable contradiction between Georgian and European values. In general, members of this group are characterized by dissatisfaction with their standard of living and skepticism towards the government. It is important to note that this applies not only to the current government, but also to every government that has headed the country since independence. Euro-nihilists are suspicious of all the potential benefits associated with the EU among other groups, as they believe that the government is a barrier that prevents them from enjoying the benefits that the EU offers to Georgia. The members of this group also fear that rapprochement with Europe may further intensify the conflict with Russia and repeat military aggression. Despite all this, Euro-nihilists still prefer Russia to Europe and take a negative position regarding joining the Eurasian Union.

The group of anti-Europeans fundamentally differs from all the groups discussed above, as they do not accept Georgia’s membership in the European Union. However, it should be noted that this group is more against Europe and everything European than the EU itself. The anti-Europeans themselves reject the title of “European”, although the idea of ​​Georgia’s existence on two continents is also unacceptable to them. Instead, they will boldly place Georgia on the borders of Asia. The mentioned group believes that Georgia has no real prospect of joining the European Union, but nevertheless they fear that Europe can bring disastrous consequences to the religious and national identity of Georgians with “forced propaganda of the LGBT community”. Among the anti-Europeans, there are ambivalent attitudes regarding the formation of a political alliance with the Russian Federation. However, what the members of this group do not dispute is that Russia can protect Georgia from future threats from Europe.

The findings of the study reveal that the value orientations of the study population are ambiguous and hybrid in nature. In this regard, groups of liberals and anti-Europeans stand out, where the value system is more or less linear. In the rest of the groups, intersection of values ​​and evaluations is frequent. Not infrequently, members of the group take opposing positions. The value orientations of the mentioned groups are rather fragile and highly dependent on changes in external factors. An individual’s view of the pros and cons of EU membership is shaped not only by media and public narratives about Europe, but also by how Russia is perceived by wider social groups.

It makes sense that the Georgians really don’t like Russia. The Russians, in the name of their common Orthodox Christianity and royal friendship, absorbed them in 1800 through trickery and betrayal and then set about dismantling their state, their Church, and their culture over the decades. Then the USSR did very much the same thing, accepting Georgian independence one year and then invading and absorbing them the next.

As far as the ongoing riots, it just seems to boil down to the NGO’s that generated the Rose Revolution. They have whipped up their agents and the stupid, restless youth, but the majority of the people don’t really have a problem with the so-called “Russian law” that would force foreign agents to register themselves. The over-the-top color-revolution antics over this law are phenomenal! Like a kid throwing a tantrum over nutrition labels on his Tootsie Rolls.

[I wonder what conversation that the purple-haired girl in the background is having on her phone at that moment. Oooh, how exciting! So much attention!]

What’s more interesting is whether Georgian Dream is trying to uphold some kind of distinct Georgian nationhood between the insatiable pig of the West and the lurking crocodile of the East. The only reason Georgian Dream would so assertively push this foreign-agent-labeling-bill is to restrict, to some degree or another, all of this foreign meddling that has caused Georgia to be drawn into these international games between Russia and the West. The purple-haired hags shriek over it, but Georgian Dream doesn’t seem to care about their howls this time, nor the deeply-concerned threats from the glaring sissy rulers in the West.

Georgia Dream’s political platform is wishy washy, but they have made some other assertive actions in the past few years. They tried to sue and impeach their liberal woman president a few times, and they changed the constitution to make future presidents appointed by parliament, which takes effect this year, I think. They had Saakashvili arrested in 2021. But those are all personality feuds. This stance by Georgia Dream in the face of spoiled-ADHD-kid riots seems to mark a new direction. Maybe a direction towards sovereign nationhood. Maybe!

The history of Georgia is a tumultuous one, probably the most amazing and heroic of all Christendom. Throughout the centuries, from ancient times to today, wave after wave of bloody foreign invasions and occupations, and then civil wars, and then more invasions, almost without rest, and always finally redeemed by the heroism of the fighting saints that the nation just seems to spawn in their darkest hours. They survived the Romans, the Byzantines, the Persians, the Turks, the Mongols, the Russians, the Communists, and now they must persevere against the worst enemy of them all: the mind-virus tentacles of the relentless liberal West.

Can they do it? If any nation could ever resist, it is the Georgians! Noble resistance runs in the Georgian blood, and stubborn perseverance cries out from their blood-soaked land!

[David IV, known as the builder, or restorer, of the free Georgian nation. A true hero among so many true heroes!]

Lines to a Georgian Mother

O Georgian mother! Thou gavest sons
To home and land in days of yore.
The future braves were lulled to sleep
With lullabies and mountain lore.
Alas! those days are past, and now
By sorrow is thy country swayed.
Thy very breath of life is fled.
Thy warrior son is now a shade.
Where is the courage of our sires,
The dagger and the crushing blow,
The honour and the pride of old,
The fearless struggle with the foe?
But why should we shed idle tears
For glory that is past and gone;
Another star, O Georgians, must
We find to guide and lead us on.
It is our duty to prepare
The future for the people, and —
Ah here, O mother, is thy task,
Thy sacred duty to thy land:
Endow thy sons with spirits strong,
With strength of heart and honour bright,
Inspire them with fraternal love,
To strive for freedom and for right;
Infuse in them God’s Gospel wise,
Give them true courage for the fight,
And thus enrich our land with sons
Who’ll change this darkness into light.
O mother! hear thy country’s plea:
Nurture thy sons with spirits strong
Led by the torch of truth whose flame
Will banish ignorance and wrong.
— Ilia Chavachavadze (1837-1907)

Leave a comment
by Janus on 19 April 2024  •  Permalink
Posted in C. F. van Niekerk
Tagged

Posted by Janus on 19 April 2024

https://finesetinitia.wordpress.com/2024/04/19/the-western-mind-virus-infects-the-urban-youths-of-the-nation-of-georgia/

Child Labor

– 12 April 2024 –

Janus:

With the shortages of labor in the post-Covid American workforce, some states are beginning to loosen their child labor laws. Is this a positive development, or a negative one? Are child labor laws too strict? It’s an interesting question, and not as simple as the Leftists or the free-market conservatives would suggest.

Via the Associated Press, 25 May 2023:

Lawmakers in several states are embracing legislation to let children work in more hazardous occupations, for more hours on school nights and in expanded roles, including serving alcohol in bars and restaurants as young as 14.

The efforts to significantly roll back labor rules are largely led by Republican lawmakers to address worker shortages and, in some cases, run afoul of federal regulations.

Child welfare advocates worry the measures represent a coordinated push to scale back hard-won protections for minors.

[. . .]

[“Gov. Kim Reynolds, shown here in a file photo from May 4, 2023, signed legislation May 26 loosening some of Iowa’s child labor laws.” I think this file photo showed Mrs. Reynolds signing a bill about electronic registration renewal of off-road utility vehicles, which pleased the off-road-utility enthusiasts in the background to no end!]

Legislators in Wisconsin, Ohio and Iowa are actively considering relaxing child labor laws to address worker shortages, which are driving up wages and contributing to inflation. Employers have struggled to fill open positions after a spike in retirements, deaths and illnesses from COVID-19, decreases in legal immigration and other factors.

The job market is one of the tightest since World War II, with the unemployment rate at 3.4% — the lowest in 54 years.

Bringing more children into the labor market is, of course, not the only way to solve the problem. Economists point to several other strategies the country can employ to alleviate the labor crunch without asking kids to work more hours or in dangerous settings.

The most obvious is allowing more legal immigration, which is politically divisive but has been a cornerstone of the country’s ability to grow for years in the face of an aging population. Other strategies could include incentivizing older workers to delay retirement, expanding opportunities for formerly incarcerated people and making child-care more affordable, so that parents have greater flexibility to work.

Ah, yes! More felons and foreigners! More mothers in the workplace! These Leftist-created problems always have Leftist-created solutions that somehow always trend in the same nation-destroying direction!

[A ponzi scheme solution to the problems of American nationhood.]

But what does this easing of child labor look like? And what are the likely effects?

In Wisconsin, lawmakers are backing a proposal to allow 14-year-olds to serve alcohol in bars and restaurants. If it passed, Wisconsin would have the lowest such limit nationwide, according to the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.

The Ohio Legislature is on track to pass a bill allowing students ages 14 and 15 to work until 9 p.m. during the school year with their parents’ permission. That’s later than federal law allows, so a companion measure asks the U.S. Congress to amend its own laws.

Under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, students that age can only work until 7 p.m. during the school year. Congress passed the law in 1938 to stop children from being exposed to dangerous conditions and abusive practices in mines, factories, farms and street trades.

Republican Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders signed a law in March eliminating permits that required employers to verify a child’s age and a parent’s consent. Without work permit requirements, companies caught violating child labor laws can more easily claim ignorance.

[. . .]

[Sarah Huckabee Sanders making strange faces.]

Iowa Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds signed a law last year allowing teens aged 16 and 17 to work unsupervised in child care centers. The state Legislature approved a bill this month to allow teens of that age to serve alcohol in restaurants. It would also expand the hours minors can work. Reynolds, who said in April she supports more youth employment, has until June 3 to sign or veto the measure.

Republicans dropped provisions from a version of the bill allowing children aged 14 and 15 to work in dangerous fields including mining, logging and meatpacking. But it kept some provisions that the Labor Department says violate federal law, including allowing children as young as 14 to briefly work in freezers and meat coolers, and extending work hours in industrial laundries and assembly lines.

[. . .]

“There’s no reason why anyone should have to get the government’s permission to get a job,” Republican Arkansas Rep. Rebecca Burkes, who sponsored the bill to eliminate child work permits, said on the House floor. “This is simply about eliminating the bureaucracy that is required and taking away the parent’s decision about whether their child can work.”

Margaret Wurth, a children’s rights researcher with Human Rights Watch, a member of the Child Labor Coalition, described bills like the one passed in Arkansas as “attempts to undermine safe and important workplace protections and to reduce workers’ power.”

Current laws fail to protect many child workers, Wurth said.

She wants lawmakers to end exceptions for child labor in agriculture. Federal law allows children 12 and older to work on farms for any amount of time outside of school hours, with parental permission. Farm workers over 16 can work at dangerous heights or operate heavy machinery, hazardous tasks reserved for adult workers in other industries.

Twenty-four children died from work injuries in in 2021, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Around half of deadly work incidents happened on farms, according to a report from the Government Accountability Office covering child deaths between 2003 and 2016.

“More children die working in agriculture than in any other sector,” Wurth said. “Enforcement isn’t going to help much for child farm workers unless the standards improve.”

[Margaret Wurth of Human Rights Watch, professionally upset. She does make human rights worth watching, I’ll admit.]

These arguments are nothing new, and the Left likes to evoke the faded memories of the old 19th century Dickensian hell of little barefoot children toiling in filthy factories, while the common Limbaugh-esque conservatives downplay the whole issue and generically cite individual liberty, free enterprise, and the American way. But the real question, taken at face value, boils down to whether or not there is room to tweak current child labor laws or not.

The Historical Issue of Child Labor

When the issue of child labor laws came to the fore in the United States during the Progressive Era of the late 19th/early 20th centuries, industrial child labor really had grown into a serious problem. Thousands of actual children between the ages of six and twelve (as compared to adolescent youths) worked 12-hour shifts in physically dangerous factories and mines while earning very low wages compared to adult workers. And the proportion of children in industry was growing faster than the rates of employment for men or women. According to US census data, by 1900 (roughly the peak of child labor in the United States), 1.75 million out of 8 million total children between the ages of 6 and 13 were gainfully employed; that’s about 22% of the total. And 62.5% of employed child workers earned their livings outside of agriculture. Certainly the problem needed to be addressed.

Yet the issue of child labor (however real) was exaggerated and exploited by all the usual suspects. In the late 19th/early 20th centuries, very few children had the luxury to not productively work at all. Most of them worked informally for families (sometimes in small, home-based industries), and most families worked on farms. Summers off from school did not exist for the purpose of family vacations and baseball leagues; the breaks were needed for agricultural labor. Liberal reformers and social activists used the problem of industrial child labor to agitate for compulsory education laws (to uniformly indoctrinate children), adult labor laws, women’s rights, and other secular and socialist programs. Very few of the most outspoken activists, people like Jane Addams, Frieda S. Miller (whose lesbian “partner” was labor activist Pauline Newman), limited their efforts merely to child labor. Child labor was a means to an end.

Though child labor was a contentious issue, muddled by the competing agendas of socialist egalitarians and greedy industrialists, the child labor laws that managed to pass tended to make sense. They tended to prevent the worst of the industrial abuses while protecting healthy forms of child labor. Such laws in the United States ultimately culminated in parts of the national Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.

Via the Bureau of Labor Statistics:

“The FLSA forbade the shipment of goods in interstate commerce when child labor had been employed in their production within 30 days prior to shipment. The law restricted legal child labor to those ages 16 and over except for hazardous occupations. These occupations had a minimum age of 18. These minimums were increases over the previous unsuccessful federal child labor laws that both contained limits of 14 years of age generally and 16 years of age for hazardous work. At the time the FLSA passed, only 11 states had a 16-year age limit.143 In addition, the law outlawed children under 16 from engaging in industrial homework.”

The bill also allowed children between 14 and 16 to work in these non-hazardous occupations during limited hours. And interestingly, the bill only affected about six percent of the already declining numbers of child laborers in 1938 (roughly 850,000 in number), meaning that child labor was already declining because of rising living standards and more rigorous state laws.

[A photo of children working in a cotton mill in the 1910’s, taken by Left-wing activist Lewis Hine. Despite his subversive agendas, Hine’s photos provided effective propaganda against the extremes of child labor.]

Apart from some modifications in 1949, the national law still stands today. Generally speaking, the laws regarding child labor are quite reasonable and they make necessary distinctions between actual children (those up to age 13) and older teenagers, and between family/agricultural work and work by commercial/industrial employers.

It should be noted that the child labor restrictions established in the 1938 law were temporarily loosened during World War II because of the labor shortages caused by the loss of fighting-age men to the war effort:

“At the federal level, the Secretary of Labor revised an antichild labor clause that had been included in government contracts since World War I, thereby allowing girls 16-to-18 years old to work on World War II contracts.151 Furthermore, the Secretary also granted temporary exemptions to allow 14- and 15-year-olds to work outside of school hours.”

Child Labor Becomes a Political Football Today

This change during World War II to meet labor demand in a national emergency is significant today because the current shortages of labor caused by a combination of post-Covid malaise and the mass-retirement of Baby Boomers are straining the system in a time of growing national and international instability.

It’s also no surprise that the same egalitarian socialists and greedy corporate capitalists are exploiting this issue like they exploit and manipulate the discourse on anything else. The major difference between the hysterics today versus the hysterics of 100 years ago is the fact that the politicians during the early 20th century hadn’t fully sold their souls; their electorates still demanded a degree of integrity and common sense. This is no longer the case today!

As usual with political debate in “our democracy,” the matter in dispute (in this case, child labor) isn’t the real issue here between the two supposed sides, at least not at the behind-the-scenes levels: this is merely the battleground issue in a false dialectic, just another political football.

What does the Left really want here? Do they really care about keeping children safe when they are currently pushing ever-increasing daycare, lowered age-of-consent laws, puberty blockers for child sex changes, and even worse? Of course not! The Left wants to keep children and youth in government-controlled schools so they can receive their proper indoctrination, and they want to promote the liberal concept of childrens’ rights, undermining parental authority (and protection) while keeping youths in a permanent state of dependence on the system.

[It doesn’t sound so bad, does it? Until you realize what these so-called rights entail.]

And what do the so-called conservatives really want? They want to loosen the hiring restrictions for minors that corporations have to deal with. They want a larger hiring pool and less business regulation for the sake of corporate business, and all of this to promote the neo-liberal concept of free markets and the right to work, turning education even further into a path towards the corporate workforce. If it’s good for the economy, it’s good for the people, right?

Both of these disingenuous, partisan solutions, in their present form, will cause further harm to children and to the national fabric. Suppose that this debate leads to both a lifting of restrictions on mass child labor and the enshrinement of children’s rights, including the right to body autonomy, including sexual liberty, and the right to freely seek employment, including in the so-called industry of “adult entertainment.” What sort of hell might this false dialectic turn into?

[Does children working in “adult entertainment” seem so far-fetched, when it‘s already happening, like these boys dressed up as parodies of sexualized women?! And if this is already happening, then how great of a leap for children to engage in legalized supposedly consensual “sex work?” The slippery slope is a real phenomenon, as today’s dystopia shows!]

This isn’t such a far-fetched idea under the current system.

But there is another facet to this issue that the partisans are largely ignoring.

Today’s Real Child Labor Crisis

While it’s true that old-style child factory labor is a growing illegal problem among certain immigrant groups (which is really a problem of unfettered immigration more than anything), the real crisis in child labor that affects the vast numbers of American children and adolescents today arises from a lack of productive child labor and too much pointless leisure. It’s the opposite problem from a hundred years ago!

To quickly sum up the problems with our children and adolescents: when analyzed as a collective, they are spoiled and neglected at the same time. They are given too much leisure and involved in too many indulgent institutional activities at the same time. They simultaneously have too many rights and choices, and too few actual liberties and responsibilities. They are unsupervised in their phone worlds and constantly surveiled in the real world. They are over-socialized and mindlessly alone. They are fat and take anti-depressants while they have hyperactivity and no attention spans. They ruin their flabby appearances with unnatural hair dies and piercings while they bemoan their own ugliness. They demand total independence and autonomy while they refuse to drive, get a job, or move out of their parents’ homes when they’ve grown up. They are completely self-absorbed while the only people they really care about in their lives are online celebrities. In short, the children and youth today, taken as a whole, have achieved levels of human brokenness that have no match in human history. They are functionally useless, like mushrooms growing on tools left rusting and rotting in the dirt.

[Fungus kids popping up like mushrooms in a landfill.]

Certainly we can lay much of the blame on smartphones and social media. These have massively exacerbated the problem, with just about every kid addicted to them! But this really comes down to overindulgence by the parents and coddling by societal institutions, something that really started to get out of hand by the 1990’s, though it began with the Baby Boomers in the 1950’s. With the near universality of working and divorced parents, and the flood of easy luxuries in an economy based on easy credit, parents were too tired and overwhelmed to parent, and it was easy to plop their children in front of a television or a video game or—now—give them a smartphone, or enroll them in various extra-curriculars, so these children will leave the parents to vain distractions of their own.

And now we have thirty-year-olds who still live with their parents and don’t know what they want to be when they grow up, and we have young women paying soulless doctors to cut their breasts off and calling themselves non-binary men while they work half-assed in online jobs that serve no constructive purpose.

[NEET’s! They even got a fancy name for themselves! More like nits!]

Frankly, it is healthier for a ten-year-old child to work six-day shifts in a robber baron textile mill and smoke unfiltered cigarettes than for that child to sit for hours every day on Minecraft or scrolling through who-knows-what on a phone while getting fat on pizza rolls with nothing to do and nobody to really talk to. I would rather see my little children smoke cigars and shoplift from stores than to take anti-depressants and decide they are their opposite genders. Yes, both extremes are bad, but if the problems of 100 years ago amounted to a social illness, the problems today are social quadriplegia.

The crisis stems from a lack of productive child enterprise. If schools ever really provided guidance in industry, creativity, and healthy civics, they certainly fail to do so now. But the home life was always more important socially than the school life. Children at home who are expected to work in a productive capacity fare better in life than those who are allowed to idle away their time. It’s a matter of common sense, but research backs this up. And if the children are kept busy with productive work with their families and churches, then they have less time for video games, smartphones, and extracurricular activities at toxic schools with their toxic, shallow cliques. Less time to devote to neuroses, insecurities, and peculiar vanities.

Particular focus should be given to teenaged youths. Teenagers are not children, and they shouldn’t be treated as children. Nor are they full adults, of course. Adolescents should be guided as apprentices in real work at home, in farms, or through outside employment, in addition to useful education, and they shouldn’t have significant amounts of idle time. The Amish, for instance, traditionally stop school education at the eighth grade; after that, their children work on family farms and in industry with adults, and they learn valuable skills, take on responsibilities that build their confidence, and accomplish important tasks for their families and communities to prepare them for adulthood, and they still manage to have leisure time with their friends, perhaps too much so these days. Teenagers ought to have a career path well-established for them long before they turn eighteen.

[Young teenaged Amish girls working with adults in a family bakery.]

In short, parents should encourage their youths to productively work for much of their time. And it certainly wouldn’t hurt to modify child labor laws to encourage the gainful employment of teenagers in apprenticeships and internships, or even general, non-hazardous employment. Such measures will certainly create stronger, saner, healthier citizens than the sickly, crippled, freaks that lurk everywhere on their phones today.

Too bad we can’t trust today’s society and its leaders to secure the healthy existence of our peoples and the future of our children.

Leave a comment
by Janus on 12 April 2024  •  Permalink
Posted in Janus
Tagged ,

Posted by Janus on 12 April 2024

https://finesetinitia.wordpress.com/2024/04/12/child-labor/

Poor Moldovans

– 5 April 2024 –

Janus:

The government of Moldova seems determined to follow the foolish example of Zelensky’s Ukraine in transforming itself into a belligerently anti-Russian, pro-Western pawn.

Lately the West has poured money and resources into Moldova—and more recently, soldiers—as an insurance policy against Russia if Ukraine should happen to fall.

Via Asia Times:

Big trouble may be brewing in little Moldova, which is starting to look like a staging area for the European Union to offset an emerging Russian victory in Ukraine. Whether such a plan, if attempted, would succeed is not clear. But Moldova is not the most stable country in the world with the nation split between pro-EU and pro-Russian elements.

US troops are now in Moldova with Romanians, ostensibly for a military exercise called JCET 2024 (Joint Command Exchange Training). The exercise started on April 1 and will continue until April 19.

According to a Moldovan Ministry of Defense statement, “The aim of the exercise is joint training and exchange of experience between Moldovan, Romanian and American special forces, as well as to increase the level of interoperability between the participating contingents. This year’s event will also be attended by representatives of the [Moldovan] State Protection and Security Service and the Pantera Special Forces.”

These exercises are not new but they taken on new urgency now because of the developing situation in neighboring Ukraine.

[. . .]

[Supporters or occupiers?]

The United States has made nearly US$320 million available in new economic, security, and humanitarian assistance to help Moldova. This assistance includes $30 million in non-reimbursable budget support disbursed in December 2022 for electricity purchases.[. . .]

[. . .]

Officially, Moldova is supposed to be a neutral country. There is talk of changing its constitution to allow it to join military alliances and, potentially, to join NATO. Joint training with foreign countries (the US and Romania) would appear to violate current constitutional neutrality provisions.

Romania is keen on building up its military relationship with Moldova. Legislation is pending in Romania to allow it to intervene outside the country. Such actions would not be limited to the military but might also involve other types of interventions to counter hybrid threats. The focus of the new law is Moldova and Ukraine.

Romania supplies 80-90% of Moldova’s energy. It has built a gas pipeline ultimately connecting Cisenau with Romania, largely financed by grants and loans from the European community. Moldova no longer receives gas from Russia.

According to Romanian sources, there are 600,000 Romanian citizens in Moldova (most with hybrid citizenship). Romania is positioning itself to “protect” its Moldovan citizens in case of conflict.

Moldova is the second poorest country in Europe after Ukraine. In 2022, Moldova’s per capita income was $5,688. Ukraine’s was $4,005 (before the current war). Eastern Europe overall has a per capita income of $11,855.

In particular, the breakaway de-facto Republic of Transnistria presents a somewhat comparable situation with Ukraine’s eastern provinces that broke away after the 2014 Maidan coup, though Transnistria has maintained its unrecognized independence since the unraveling of the Soviet Union in 1990.

[Moldova is yellowish, and Transnistria is pink.]

Though Transnistria is only about 30% Russian, the roughly 360,000 people who live there seem to prefer Russian affiliation to Moldovan. Lately, they have appealed to Russia for help against an increasingly aggressive Moldova:

Via The Moscow Times:

Moldova’s pro-Russian breakaway region of Transnistria has made international headlines in recent weeks after its leadership called on Moscow to “protect” it from Moscow against alleged pressure from Chisinau.

While some experts warn that Transnistria — a sliver of land bordering Ukraine that hosts a small contingent of Russian soldiers — could act as a conduit for Russia to foment regionwide instability amid its war on Kyiv, others remain skeptical.

The “protection” request “is basically a message from Tiraspol and Moscow that circumstances change, especially with the invasion of Ukraine,” said Cristian Cantar, an associate professor of international relations at Oakland University from Moldova.

“If circumstances change, especially in Russia’s favor, that would then allow an escalation that could be legitimized by these narratives.”

Since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 sent shockwaves through Moldova, one of Europe’s poorest countries, the country has seen a surge in support for moving out of Russia’s orbit and closer to the West. Moldova entered European Union accession discussions in 2023 and its citizens will vote later this year on joining the bloc. 

While Transnistria has kept a relatively low profile during Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine, fears that the breakaway region could become a flashpoint between East and West regularly surface as the war drags on and Moldova pursues EU accession.

[. . .]

[Soviet style billboards in Transnistria. Transnistrians romanticize their Soviet past, much like Russians do today.]

Transnistria held a referendum on joining Russia at its last “special congress” in 2006, where over 95% of voters backed integration with Russia. Moscow never publicly responded. 

Though Russia has a consulate in Transnistria — a region internationally recognized as part of Moldova — Moscow has stopped short of recognizing it as an independent state.

[. . .]

Keith Harrington, a lecturer in Soviet history at Trinity College Dublin and a specialist on Transnistria, said that the breakaway region has “virtually no bargaining power.”

“Russia is not in a position to give real help and the West is backing Moldova,” said Harrington. “Asking for Russia’s assistance is just a ploy. They have done it before, such as in the 2006 referendum.”

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Russia is “open” to providing assistance to Transnistria but stressed that “we prefer settling all issues without any exceptions by means of a dialogue, a political dialogue.”

Chisinau has taken a measured response to Transnistria’s plea for protection, keeping with its approach since the start of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. 

“From their perspective, they just have to wait and keep applying pressure to the separatist regime. Right now, the tide is turning in Moldova’s favor,” said Harrington.

For the moment, Russian intervention in Transnistria seems unlikely. What would Russia gain that would justify the risks and costs, at least under present circumstances? But Moldova has every incentive, at this point, to sweep in and occupy Transnistria, if they can manage it with their 4,000-man army.

[They seem like decent fellows. It’s too bad that they serve such a lousy government.]

If 4,000 men seems like very few, the Moldovan government is backed by the West, and now hosts American soldiers at least for the short-term. Also, Russian power remains remote, since most of Ukraine still stands between the tiny breakaway republic and Russia’s armies. As the future of Ukraine increasingly seems uncertain, despite Western bravado, an American-backed invasion of Transnistria seems prudent for Moldova, as it could deprive Russia of a beachhead, and nobody is going to defend the unrecognized republic from the country they recognize as having sovereignty over the territory (though I suppose Russia could use such an invasion as a pretext for militarily backing the Transnistrians at some point in the future, if not immediately.)

Regardless of what Moldova does or doesn’t do with Transnistria, Moldovan cozying up to the West will likely mean fake elections to remove the country’s neutrality, a build-up of the country’s military, continuous foreign military presence, and joining NATO and/or the EU. The present effeminate government, with its Harvard-educated, liberal female president (Maia Sandu), is bent on enacting such policies and further pushing social liberalization. Moldova seems determined to become the next bulwark against Russian aggression (or—more accurately—the next staging ground for Western aggression against Russia.)

[Moldovan President Maia Sandu meeting Joe Biden in Warsaw to beg for American assistance, and to thank him “for the support provided by the US for the economic development and democratic transformation of the country.“]

Moldovans would be much wiser to retain their constitutional neutrality, even without all of the economic largesse that the West is dumping on them. But if the people won’t fight against gay parades any longer, then they won’t resist Western subversion either. (Just like conservatives in America.)

When a whole generation of Moldovan men are ruined in the looming world war, regardless of its outcome, I sure hope that the Western credit-card goodies made the price worth it!

That price has surely proved worthwhile for the Ukrainians!

C. F. van Niekerk:

I wonder how Maia Sandu will look in her own version of Zelensky’s “under siege” green t-shirt?!

[“Begging for aid? Just take a number and have a seat. Mr. Blinken is having a meeting with Mr. Netanyahu right now…”]
Leave a comment
by Janus on 5 April 2024  •  Permalink
Posted in C. F. van Niekerk, Janus
Tagged , ,

Posted by Janus on 5 April 2024

https://finesetinitia.wordpress.com/2024/04/05/poor-moldovans/

Cynical Political Rhetoric and Tranny Visibility

– 1 April 2024 –

C. F. van Niekerk:

Christ is risen! Yesterday was Easter Sunday for Western Christianity. Normally these days, this miraculous gift of God’s glory and mercy passes without much public fanfare, apart from a few tepid announcements with a few pictures of bunnies and eggs. But not this year.

This year Western Easter coincided with Transgender Day of Visibility, yet another new holy day for the infernal religion of “democracy” and “Western values.” As if trannies need to advertise their already grotesque visibility, even though, ironically, they are desperately striving for invisibility in the form of “passing” as the other gender.

Political conservatives, whether they were legitimately outraged or whether they cynically exploited this coincidence in dates, scored something of a cultural victory by pointing out that doddering Joe Biden’s White House had declared Easter Sunday as Transgender Day of Visibility, making it seem like this fake holiday was something new.

[Notice the bunny and eggs in the logo. So cute.]

In fact, Joe Biden’s White House has issued proclamations to commemorate the Satanic holiday every March 31 since 2021. And where was all this outrage then?

In fairness, Joe Biden’s White House issued the tranny proclamation this year on March 29, not Easter Sunday, though the infernal day itself, of course, fell on Easter. On March 29, Biden’s office also issued ten other touchy-feely, mostly liberal, proclamations: for Second Chance Month (for released criminals), Month of the Military Child (to honor the children of service members), Care Workers Recognition Month, National Child Abuse Prevention Month, National Public Health Week, Arab-American Heritage Month, National Cancer Prevention and Early Detection Month, Cesar Chavez Day (who now has to share his special day with trannies), National Donate Life Month (for organ donors, which I don’t recommend ever doing, by the way!), and National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. Additionally, Biden’s office issued three other pointless statements, one of them condemning Russia’s imprisonment of the Jewish journalist Evan Gershkovich for spying.

The White House issues this nonsense all the time, particularly at the end of every month. To think that hundreds, if not thousands, of useless government office drones are employed full-time on fat salaries to produce this nonsense is appalling unto itself.

[“We have no veins in our heads!”]

The conservatives also give us the impression that Joe Biden didn’t acknowledge Easter at all, but that’s not true. On March 31, Easter Sunday, the White House issued a more personal statement, actually a pretty decent, if somewhat generic statement, acknowledging the death and resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ:

Jill and I send our warmest wishes to Christians around the world celebrating Easter Sunday. Easter reminds us of the power of hope and the promise of Christ’s Resurrection.

As we gather with loved ones, we remember Jesus’ sacrifice. We pray for one another and cherish the blessing of the dawn of new possibilities. And with wars and conflict taking a toll on innocent lives around the world, we renew our commitment to work for peace, security, and dignity for all people.

From our family to yours, happy Easter and may God bless you.

So what am I getting at here? Who’s side am I on, anyway? How can I defend Joe Biden, the worst president since the founding of the country?!

Here’s my point: conservatives and liberals in America are two factions of the same damned beast. To these rats, Easter is just fodder for political points. Neither side really cares about the tenets of the Christian Faith!

[“Now everybody frown for the cameras!” American politics is WWE with weak, stuffy wrastlers.]

The conservative elites see this as an opportunity to score political points, either to pretend like they care about Christianity, or, in this case, to attack their Leftist opponents in a cynical way that will rile up the rubes on their side. And it has worked quite well! Now the retards will vote even harder for Republican traitors in the next electoral shit-show! Never mind that Trump celebrated “Pride” month or Ramadan or any number of other un-Christian events.

The liberal elites kowtow to Easter, too, for the same reason that conservatives do: because that’s what “good” people do, and they want to appear “good” to their dull commoners. The liberals also cynically exploit their pet degenerate freaks for their own political gains; they care about as much for trannies as they care about our Lord or about the Easter bunny. It’s all a game to them!

The point is that these people are all full of shit! None of them is going to cancel the superficial celebration of Easter, and none of them is going to do a damned thing to stop the advance of organized sexual perversion and Satanism, or stand in the way of the slow strangulation of traditional Christianity. None of them cares! They only care about whatever set or another of elite Jews wants them to care about; everything else is just outrage theater to rustle up their polarized hoi polloi.

The only good thing about this, I guess, is that maybe a few more left-of-center but otherwise serious (if dim-witted) Christians might finally figure out that the System actively opposes their Faith, which is certainly true! But if such people haven’t figured this out by now, I can’t imagine what would matter to these vegetables at this point!

Leave a comment
by Janus on 1 April 2024  •  Permalink
Posted in C. F. van Niekerk
Tagged , , ,

Posted by Janus on 1 April 2024

https://finesetinitia.wordpress.com/2024/04/01/cynical-political-rhetoric-and-tranny-visibility/

« Older Posts
  • April 2024
    S M T W T F S
     123456
    78910111213
    14151617181920
    21222324252627
    282930