Billboard That’s Supposed to Attack Trump Proves the Point About Muslims in America


– 18 October 2016 –


Janus-smallA billboard in heavily-Muslim Dearborn, Michigan attacks Donald Trump for his supposed bigotry. The sign translates as “Donald Trump, he can’t read this, but he is afraid of it.”

Nearly all of the 330,000 people who drive past the sign each week can’t read this sign either. The sign will remind many of them that we have too many Muslims in the United States, that they pose a threat to our security and our identity by their very presence here. To top it off, the sign’s white Arabic scribbles on a black background bears a resemblance to the ISIS flag.


They’re only making a political statement, you racist bastards.

Via RT:

The campaign was bought by the Nuisance Committee and cost $4,850.

“We came up with it because we believe that Donald Trump’s hateful rhetoric is not based on reality. It’s based on fear,” Melissa Harris, a Nuisance Committee spokeswoman, told the Detroit Free Press. “And we think that irrational fear is what’s driving his anti-immigrant message.”

At the bottom of the billboard is the web address, which features a timeline of Trump’s previous statements about Muslims.

[. . .]

The Nuisance Committee is co-founded by Max Temkin, whose grandfather Ira Weinstein was shot down over Germany during a World War II combat mission and was interned in a POW camp. At the camp, Weinstein and other Jewish POWs banded together to form a “nuisance committee” to irritate their Nazi captors in ways that wouldn’t get them killed.

The group said “the comparison between Trump and Hitler is intentional.”

More Jews against Donald Trump. They sense a popular threat to their “open society” from people who are tired of a decadent, valueless society full of foreigners meant to displace us.

What’s actually funny about the Jews’ resistance is that Trump himself probably doesn’t pose a serious threat to their order. He’s not going to reverse the moral decline in the country, as he accepts homosexuals and trannies. He loves blacks and plans to create even more programs to falsely elevate them. He might stop illegal immigration, but who cares should they enter through a “big, beautiful door”. A Trump victory could mollify American whites into accepting today’s status quo. (Will I still vote for him? Yes. He’s a gamble. She’s a sure loss. Plus there’s the “fuck you” factor.)

A Trump loss on the other hand will only keep the pressure of resentment rising. The next phase of this resentment will likely make Donald Trump appear as milquetoast as the Tea Party.

If Hillary wins in November, she’d better start that nuclear war quickly before she has a civil war on her hands.

Christopher Columbus – Another White Hero Vilified by the Left


– 10 October 2016 –


Unless trends dramatically change in the next few years, official celebrations of Columbus Day around the world are coming to an end.

Via CNN:

Since Columbus Day 2015, at least 14 communities in the United States have passed measures designating the second Monday in October Indigenous Peoples Day.

The changes build on recent efforts to shift the day’s focus from the Italian explorer, beginning in big cities including Seattle, Minneapolis and Albuquerque, and spreading to counties and school districts.

“Indigenous Peoples Day represents a shift in consciousness,” said Dr. Leo Killsback, a citizen of the Northern Cheyenne Nation and assistant professor of American Indian Studies at Arizona State University.

“It acknowledges that indigenous peoples and their voices are important in today’s conversations.”

“Conversations.” There’s another word that the Left has hijacked and mangled. On the surface, it’s a mutual exchange of thoughts and ideas between multiple parties; but in the Left’s context, a “conversation” is their attempt to force one group of people to quietly accept self-righteous, condescending, and utterly self-destructive instruction.

Even in the Spain, where the monarchy sponsored Columbus’ voyage, people are rethinking his legacy.

A group of left-wing city council members in Barcelona called for the city to remove a 196-foot statue of Christopher Columbus in one of its most heavily trafficked intersections as part of a proposal to strike the October 12 national holiday and return it to a regular working day.

Council member María José Lecha González said public commemoration of Columbus glorifies colonialism and imperialism, and called the holiday a “mockery” of the genocide of the indigenous population.


Formerly a monument to the man who discovered the Americas for Europe, now a monument to the ugly barbaric forces who will destroy what European peoples have built.

Regardless of how Columbus treated the Indians he encountered (and it doesn’t seem that he treated them any worse than European peasants of that time), Columbus bravely crossed the Atlantic, discovered America for European civilization, and established an enduring European presence. We of European descent in the Americas owe our existence, our cultures, and our nations to the vision of this one man. Had some other explorer discovered America ten, fifty, or a hundred years later, today’s world would be radically different.

Those of native descent have no reason to celebrate Columbus. He ultimately brought the diseases that wiped so many of them out, and the settlers who displaced them. Today, some of these natives see the weakness of whites and are taking advantage.

But don’t imagine for a second that our capitulation to these groups will win their thanks and approval for very long. They don’t want dialogue and understanding, they will tear us down until we are a forgotten people, if we continue to let them. And these natives will live no better after our demise.

If we don’t defend our symbols and our history, then we have no future.

A good defense of Columbus can be found at the Catholic Education Resource Center:

In all of history, only the Europeans and the Polynesians of the south Pacific have been true discoverers, sailing for the explicit purpose of finding new lands, trading with their people, and colonizing them. And of all discoverers Christopher Columbus was the greatest, because he accomplished the most against the highest odds.

Before Columbus’ time all European voyages had followed coastlines, or crossed open seas to lands previously known or at least sighted by storm-driven ships. Only Columbus set off directly across a broad, unknown sea with no specific knowledge of how far it extended or what lay on the other side. To be sure, Columbus was convinced that he could reach Asia from Europe within the time during which the provisions he carried in his three ships would sustain his men. But he was wrong about that. If America had not existed — had not been in the way — Columbus would have had to turn back long before reaching his goal, or he and every man on his ships would have died.

[. . .]

When, after leaving the Canary Islands September 6, they had been out of sight of land for a full month — a longer voyage out of sight of land than any other in the history of the world up to that time — Columbus’ men became frightened and angry. During most of the voyage the wind, often strong, had blown from astern or nearly so. How were they ever going to get back, beating against it? Columbus knew that further north the prevailing winds blew from the west, and planned to go north to catch the westerlies before he returned. But his men knew nothing of world geography; all they knew was what they had seen, that in these strange and empty seas the winds almost always blew from the east or the northeast. On October 10 the men of the Santa Maria came to the verge of open mutiny.[6]

Columbus tells us in his Log how he answered them:

They [the crew] could stand it no longer. They grumbled and complained of the long voyage, and I reproached them for their lack of spirit, telling them that, for better or worse, they had to complete the enterprise on which the Catholic Sovereigns [Isabel and Fernando] had sent them. I cheered them on as best I could, telling them of all the honors and rewards they were about to receive. I also told the men that it was useless to complain, for I had started out to find the Indies and would continue until I had accomplished that mission, with the help of Our Lord.[7]

That last sentence summed up the heart and essence of the whole life and achievement of Christopher Columbus.

[. . .]

Upon the islands that he first discovered on the other side of the Atlantic, Columbus found native inhabitants, whom he called Indians, believing himself to be in “the Indies” of Asia. And here began the long and troubled story of Columbus’ interaction with the native Americans.

Before going into the historical details of that interaction, it is essential to clear away the fog of idealization and special pleading that now surrounds so much talk about the American Indians. First of all we have to understand the situation that existed in the world of the Indian of the Caribbean and mid- America when Columbus arrived.

It seems to be true, as is so often repeated today, that when Columbus found them, the Indians inhabiting the Bahama Islands, Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the great island the Spanish called Hispaniola (now divided between Haiti and the Dominican Republic) were a gentle, happy, attractive people living peacefully in good ecological balance with their surroundings. They were known as Taino, or Arawaks.[8]

But they were not destined to remain in their Eden-like situation for long, even if Columbus and the Spanish had not come. Advancing steadily northward from the long chain of Caribbean islands called the Antilles was one of the most ferocious people in recorded history, the Caribs. They were savage conquerors who practiced cannibalism, not as an occasional cultic ritual, but as a regular diet. Captured prisoners were immediately eaten. Conquered peoples were systematically devoured. On every island they seized, the Caribs soon exterminated every Taino. On no island did the two tribes coexist.[9]

Across the island-studded Caribbean Sea lay Mexico. Though politically and culturally advanced beyond most other Indian cultures — the Mexica had a large army, a well-developed governmental administration, a system of writing, and stone temples — their empire, which we call Aztec, carried out ritual human sacrifice on a scale far exceeding any recorded of any other people in the history of the world. The law of the Mexica empire required a thousand human sacrifices to the god Huitzilopochtli in every town with a temple, every year; there were 371 subject towns in the empire, and the majority had full-scale temples. There were many other sacrifices as well. The total number was at least 50,000 a year, probably much more. The early Mexican historian Ixtlilxochitl estimated that one out of every five children in Mexico was sacrificed. When in the year 1487 the immense new temple of Huitzilopochtli was dedicated in Tenochtitlan (now Mexico City), more than 80,000 men were sacrificed, at fifteen seconds per man, for four days and four nights of almost unimaginable horror.[10]

It must be emphasized that there is no serious dispute about these facts and figures. All reputable and informed historians of pre-Columbian Mexico[11] accept their essential accuracy, though some prefer not to talk about them. These facts of history totally dispose of the romantic fantasy of a hemisphere full of peaceful, nature-loving Indians who threatened no one until the cruel white man came.

That the conversion of the people he found was a central purpose of Christopher Columbus is made unmistakably clear by an entry in his log book written November 6, when he was exploring the coast of Cuba. It is addressed directly to Isabel and Fernando:

I have to say, Most Serene Princes, that if devout religious persons know the Indian language well, all these people would soon become Christians. Thus I pray to Our Lord that Your Highnesses will appoint persons of great diligence in order to bring to the Church such great numbers of peoples, and that they will convert these peoples. . . . And after your days, for we are all mortal, you will leave your realms in a very tranquil state, free from heresy and wickedness, and you will be well received before the Eternal Creator.[12]

Two Female Black Navy Sailors Refuse to Stand for National Anthem (So Far)


– 27 September 2016 –


Janus-smallTwo U.S. Navy sailors, both of them black and female, in two separate incidents, have refused to stand for the National Anthem. At least one of them vows to continue this protest; the other remains unidentified.

Via RT:

A US Navy soldier is being disciplined for failing to stand for the national anthem in an act of protest inspired by footballer Colin Kaepernick.

Janaye Ervin has served in the military since 2008 but felt she could no longer stand for the national anthem following a series of instances of police brutality against black Americans.

“I feel like a hypocrite singing about ‘land of the free’ when I know that only applies to some Americans,” she explained in a Facebook post that has since been removed. “I will gladly stand again, when ALL AMERICANS are afforded the same freedom.”

Since staging her protest, the active duty sailor says she has had her security clearance revoked and was threatened with jail time.

Ervin is the second sailor to take part in the growing anti-anthem movement. An unnamed sailor in Florida was shown sitting during the anthem with her fist held up in a nod to the ‘black power’ salute.

“Until this country shows that they’ve got my back as a black woman, that they’ve got my people’s back — not even just being black but people of color — I can’t. And I won’t,” she explained.


So special. A hero of today’s military, bravely standing up for her special rights against a tyrannical racist military. Never mind that the country let her join our military, which it shouldn’t have done. Why do we put up with this?

Active members of the military are restricted by rules which govern their conduct. It is technically illegal for Navy members to protest this way, according to Navy Regulation 1205, which requires personnel to stand and salute the flag, or place their hand over their heart during the national anthem. Breaching this is classed as a serious offense and is punishable under Article 92 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

The Navy has responded to the two acts of protest by publishing new guidelines which remind members of the above regulations, and feature restrictions on social media etiquette.

“Sailors will receive training on the appropriate usage of social media and must not use it to discredit the Naval Service, and should be reminded it could potentially be used as evidence against them,” it warns.

“While military personnel are not excluded from the protections granted by the First Amendment, the US Supreme Court has stated that the different character of our community and of the military mission requires a different application of those protections.”

It will be interesting to see if more of these defiant military spectacles continue.

A real military would have locked these “sailors” in the brig and then court-marshaled them. But then a real military wouldn’t have deployable female sailors at all, or transvestites, or any number of other touchy-feely policies that coddle to the individual’s feelings.

Women in particular have always needed special treatment and attention in the military, so it is no surprise that both of these black protesters happen to be women.

But the real issue here isn’t the gender of these protesters, but their race.

The presence of blacks in a white country’s military has always been a mixed bag. In the U.S., before they were fully integrated into white units, blacks often caused trouble, even during wartime. Integration merely made instances of outright revolt less likely.

To be fair, plenty of black men have served our country as soldiers and sailors with great distinction. Such men tend to keep their less enthusiastic fellows in line. But the majority of black people in the military, including many of the honorable ones, identify as blacks first and Americans second.

This is only natural, really. Blacks are a separate nation within the United States.

As the percentage of non-whites and women in the U.S. military grows, the less cohesion the military will have. Powerful EEO offices will continue to push for more leeway for protected groups to express themselves.

This is a recipe for disaster.

Without an overwhelming majority of one core group or another, racial integration of a military doesn’t work. Today whites only make up about 60% of the U.S. military. When that number drops below 50%, expect the country to soon disintegrate.

The War on White Monuments: Duke Supporters and Soros Marxists Clash in New Orleans


– 24 September 2016 –


Janus-smallA Leftist group called “Take Em Down NOLA” led a protest in New Orleans against the slow process of removing four Confederate statues and to demand further removals, particularly to take down the statue of President Andrew Jackson in Jackson Square.

Via the Kansas City Star:

Hundreds of people turned out Saturday in New Orleans’ historic French Quarter to protest a statue of Andrew Jackson and Confederate monuments in the city.

New Orleans has been struggling with what to do with a number of Confederate-era monuments in the city. The City Council voted last year to remove four of the monuments after heated public meetings but the effort has been stalled in the courts. A major hearing on their removal is slated for Wednesday.

Take Em Down NOLA, a group that has been advocating for the removal of monuments it describes as being linked to the city’s white supremacist history, called for a demonstration Saturday to take down the statue of Andrew Jackson in Jackson Square to protest the slow progress of taking down the Confederate monuments.

The Jackson statue is not one of the four Confederate monuments that the council voted to remove. Jackson is considered a key figure for leading the defense of the city in an 1815 battle against the British. But Michael Quess Moore, one of the group’s organizers, said Jackson was also a slave-owner who as president signed the controversial Indian Removal Act.

[. . .]

Shortly before the protesters arrived, white supremacist David Duke and a small group of supporters converged on the square, calling for the statue to be protected.

As Duke, who is also running for Senate, talked to supporters he was heckled by bystanders.

“I am here to defend our American heritage. Our Louisiana heritage and our New Orleans heritage,” he said.

The protests were largely peaceful although a few fights broke out between demonstrators. WWL-TV reported that seven people were arrested.


Bunch of Google degenerates with their printed signs and printed shirts. They appear well-enough funded. And no doubt the old white cuck on the right feels very self-righteous in joining this anti-white protest. I’m sure he brags about his involvement to anyone who will listen.

What is this “Take Em Down NOLA” group anyway?

Their website offers the following description:

We the people of New Orleans demand that the Mayor and City Council take immediate action to remove all monuments, school names and street signs dedicated to White Supremacists. These structures litter our city with visual reminders of the horrid legacy of slavery that terrorized so many of this city’s ancestors. They misrepresent our community. We demand the freedom to live in a city where we are not forced to pay taxes for the maintenance of public symbols that demean us and psychologically terrorize us. We demand:

  1. That the city release a timeline for the immediate removal of the monuments;
  2. That the city expand the definition from 4 specific monuments to encompass all monuments to White Supremacy;
  3. That the city develop a community driven process for the removal of the monuments and the choosing of their replacements.

If you really want to sign the petition, their site mentions that you will receive “periodic updates on activism opportunities from” Goody.

So what is Color of Change? From the ColorOfChange site:

Color Of Change helps people respond effectively to injustice in the world around us. As a national online force driven by over one million members, we move decision makers in corporations and government to create a more human and less hostile world for Black people, and all people. Until justice is real.

The Activist Facts website—which helpfully exposes the funding, agendas, and personnel of various Left-wing activist groups—mentions the Color of Change’s ties to George Soros:

Through the years, Color of Change has received considerable funding from groups controlled by George Soros, the billionaire best known for backing left-wing nonprofit groups. Since 2009, Soros’ Open Society Foundation (OSF) has given $550,000 to Color of Change and its parent organization, Citizen Engagement Laboratory (CEL). Among other recipients of donations from Soros are ACORN, People for the American Way, and, where James Rucker previously served as Director of Grassroots Mobilization. Color of Change has had numerous campaign partnerships and close ties with

Color of Change “partners” with, and is a project of CEL. CEL directs a number of other projects that could be considered carbon copies of Color of Change—most of these projects seek to engage and mobilize minority citizens to expand their political voice generally through the use of the internet. Similar to Color of Change, these organizations masquerade as champions of suppressed and disadvantaged individuals in order to advance their progressive political agenda.

Effectively, Soros and other billionaires are able to funnel their millions of dollars in donations into, CEL, and ultimately Color of Change to rally left-wing supporters to vote.

It’s interesting that these types of groups have already expanded their attacks on Confederate symbols to include Andrew Jackson tributes and memorials.

Once local and state governments quickly remove these symbols of whiteness, the Leftists will immediately demand the purge of other white icons, such as Christopher Columbus, most of our slave-owning Founding Fathers, and Henry Ford.

The cultural Marxists will not be satisfied until they have not only removed all of white history, but whiteness itself.

“Trump Will Go 26th”: What Would Happen If Globalists Assassinate Donald Trump?


– 23 September 2016 –

C. F. van Niekerk:

150708-van-NiekirkA creepy AM radio broadcast from two days ago brings to mind the possibility of Trump’s assassination before the election.

Via TruNews, via Infowars:

Man records weird message allegedly playing repeadetly on Radio: “Trump Will Go 26th”. 

  • “Trump will go 26th,” led speculations that the station had been hacked.
  • The message was heard on 1630 AM at 7am on Monday morning and allegedly went on for a full five minutes.
  • Chester Township NJ 1630AM employees apparently had no idea that the message had been broadcast.

A man driving on the New Jersey Turnpike appears to have recorded a radio message allegedly coming from his car radio tunned to 1630 AM. Some interpret the message to state “Trump will go 26th.” Questions were raised about whether the station had been hacked during the Monday morning radio show, but that has not been officiallly confirmed by the station.


If a victorious Donald Trump really does pose a threat to the globalist order, then it is only logical that the globalists, so close to ultimate world domination that they are, would use any means necessary to stop him from gaining power.

Presumably they would prefer to defeat him with a minimum of force and disruption, and certainly they have tried.

But suppose they can’t stop him peacefully. Suppose they kill him like they probably did to Huey Long in 1935?

How would the country react to Trump’s assassination?

First, it would depend on how Trump was killed. Plane crashes are popular for political assassinations. But sometimes other convenient accidents can be used. Also, seemingly healthy people can die suddenly of “natural causes”, like Justice Scalia.

Only the craziest of the crazies would question some type of stroke or heart attack, and the elites could probably get away with such a murder with minimal disruption. But such deaths are very difficult to arrange. If it was easy to kill people this way, then enemies of the elites would conveniently sicken and die more frequently. Like Snowden, for instance, or that Wikileaks guy. I don’t think it’s possible to arrange this kind of death.


Muppet McCain: “What he did was he fired up the crazies.” Maybe McCain and his cronies are interviewing some crazies of their own to take Trump down.

An accident like a plane crash is easier to pull off, and it would probably generate a manageable level of public suspicion. But one would guess that Trump is wise to this possibility and has taken steps to prevent it. With so many years in the high echelons of business, Trump is bound to keep around him a large retinue of tried-and-true associates with impeccable loyalty, people who would sacrifice their own lives to make sure he is safe from accidents.

Should those means fail, the old-fashioned deranged lone shooter can take Trump out. Probably the elites would use a desperate assassin whom the general public might sympathize with, such as a sad-eyed illegal alien who fears for his family if he’s deported. Or maybe they would use a crazed Trump supporter, proving how violent and unhinged those evil racists are, even to their friends.

But regardless of the shooter’s motives, Trump supporters would have a fit. They expect this very thing. The bellows of their fury would frighten many liberal housewives.

Still, white people don’t riot anymore, and right-wingers hardly even protest. Old Hillary would take office thinking she could manage these disgruntled deplorables like she handled Gaddafi. But she’d be wrong.

The assassination of Donald Trump would set a plate for violent death on the table for the far Right, assassination as a justified political act. The Left killed their guy, so the Right could kill, too. The whole pumpkin-headed establishment would scurry around like chipmunks with targets on their heads, and some angry lone shooters would begin to take them down as the egalitarian agenda continues its “inevitable” forward march.

And any attempts by the establishment to retaliate would only fan the flames of rage. The civil war would reach a boil within two to three years.

So let us hope and pray that Donald Trump lives long past this election.

Should We Stand Aside and Let Leftism Destroy Leftism?


– 21 September 2016 –


Janus-smallConcerning an old post at Mike Smith’s Political Commentary from 2007. It’s a different take on the lame “Democrats-are-the-real-racists” conservative narrative.

Smith speculates about what would have happened if apartheid hadn’t ended in South Africa in 1994. He makes a point that protected blacks would have reproduced out of control until a full-blown race war occurred, which the rest of the world wouldn’t have tolerated. Faced with such a scenario, what were the last apartheid leaders to do?

So what to do then? The Afrikaners knew the blacks could never run the country. They couldn’t even run their own homelands with massive aid to boot. There was no way blacks would ever be able to run South Africa. So why give them the power?

It was about self-preservation of their species. How did they achieve it? Simple. They became liberal, very liberal. Everyone and the world love liberals. They are such good people. The more liberal you are the better is your chance of winning the Nobel peace prize. Hand the country to the blacks. Let them introduce all their liberal laws, sit back and watch. Light a cigarette; get a beer, the show is called “The New South Africa”. Lets sit and watch the blacks self-destruct. Nobel prize is in the bank, so who gives a Fork.

Come with me; let me lead you into the light my friends. Affirmative Action got rid of all the doctors and nurses. State hospitals are busy grinding to a halt. Who dies? Not the whites in the private hospitals, I can assure you. Blacks. The engineers are gone, no more roads for the ambulances to travel on. No more dams and fresh water. Sewage plants are inoperative. Bad sanitation spreads diseases such as Cholera and Hepatitis B. No more electricity and more people die on operation tables.
Children are not inoculated against Polio and TB anymore. More and more blacks start to die.

Chase the farmers off their land. Starvation and malnutrition sets in and takes more lives. Teachers leave the country in droves. Education levels drop and more people die, because they are ignorant about diseases and dangers. Tie the hands of the police and criminals run rampant. More and more, mainly blacks die. The rape rate increases and HIV levels soar. Approve gay rights and marriages. More people are infected with HIV. Open the borders to illegal immigrants. Let them bring in more drugs and spread prostitution. More black people are infected with AIDS and die.

The liberal West uses Communism to depopulate Africa.

Rightwing Whites don’t need to plant bombs. Why take a gun and shoot ten black people and then spend your entire life behind bars? All you have to do, Mr. Right Winger, is become a Liberal. Liberal policies kill blacks in their hundreds of thousands if not millions. 590 000 die of AIDS alone every year in South Africa.

Mr. Right Winger, you just need to support the ANC in South Africa and they will be killing more blacks than all the bombs you could muster. What is worse is that the world will love you for it and call you a good humanitarian! You might even get a Prize or be knighted!

Unfortunately Conservatives won’t do it, because they are really good Christian People, who truly cares about blacks.

And for you Mr. Liberal; If you really care about blacks and if you really want to help them, you will become Conservative, but we also know that you never will. Either Political Correctness blinds you or you have an Agenda. Which is it?

And the blacks in this game between left and right? Shame. They believe all the Liberal Leftist, Communist lies. Even after millions of them have died, they will still believe the lies. They truly believe they are “free” and living in a “Democracy”. After all they can vote, but they vote for the party that is going to cause their ultimate destruction.

So what is the white man to do in South Africa then? My advice is to become liberal. The more liberal the higher the black death toll will be. The whites must just bite the bit (“Vasbyt”) for a few years. There will be some losses and collateral damage as there are in every war. If they can pull through that, they will be all right. Further they should propagate liberal policies amongst their own, such as “Free Love”. In other words, Whiteys; “Start breeding”. In a few years from now they might even outnumber the blacks. Open the borders to Whites from other countries. This is where the previous government went wrong. They could have gained the cream of Europe, but they were too scared that their Afrikaner culture would be affected. If they started that policy in 1948, we could have outnumbered the blacks today. That is what Canada, Australia and New Zealand are doing; taking the cream of South African whites!

So you see? What a crazy world we live in!
Liberals are actually the real Racist Rights and the Conservatives are actually the bunny hugging, caring souls.

I’m not sure I agree with Smith on this, and probably Mike Smith only half-seriously proposed it, but the theory is interesting nonetheless.

In 1994, whites made up 12.6% of the South African population, down from a peak of about 22% a hundred years earlier. They faced growing tension with their black underclass and with international Leftists, and they decided, for whatever reason, to give up power to the largely incompetent black majority.

In 2016, on a global scale, whites make up about 16% of the world population, down from a peak of 28% in 1950. Formerly white nations ran the entire world, just as whites once ruled South Africa. Today we have unrest among the world’s non-whites, fed and fanned by international Leftists, leading to black riots in the United States, widespread Islamic terrorism, and mass migrations of non-white populations into just about every white nation on Earth.

The global situation of whites today mirrors the situation of South African whites in 1994. We are programmed to feel guilty for our “privilege”, for separating ourselves from the poor non-whites of the world. So we must first let them into our lands and then succumb to their incompetent majority rule.

The results would quickly look like what we see in South Africa today: massive crime and poverty, government corruption, crumbling infrastructure, and continued racial tension.


Welcome to your future town.

If F. W. de Klerk and his bunch willfully surrendered their power in the hopes that the brown people would simply destroy themselves to the point where whites could restore themselves, then their plan was a reckless one.

If we tried this on a world scale, how well would it work out?

In the desperation of our times, it’s sometimes tempting to encourage the crazy Left to kill themselves by letting them have everything they want and then stepping back to avoid the wreckage.

But unfortunately, in such a case, wouldn’t the Left destroy us Right-wingers along with themselves?

Forced Transvestite Training for the US Navy


– 20 September 2016 –


Patulcius-sqMore signs that the United States government and its military are no longer worth supporting.

Via Church Militant, via

As the Pentagon makes changes to allow transgender service members to serve openly, the Navy is holding training to educate all troops on the new policies.

In an all-Navy message published Tuesday, Chief of Naval Personnel Vice Adm. Robert Burke said a three-pronged training approach will equip senior leaders and rank-and-file personnel for the changes.

A “three-pronged approach,” huh? There is no doubt that the greatest strategic minds available in today’s USN gathered over several days to plot their epic assault against the greatest enemy our country faces today: intolerance.

The solemn stupidity continues, blissfully clueless:

Beginning Nov. 1, mobile training teams composed of Navy fleet representatives and subject matter expects will be dispatched to deliver face-to-face briefs to senior leaders, including commanding officers, executive officers, command master chiefs, and chiefs of boat.

These sessions will also be open to equal opportunity advisers, ombudsmen and other command-designated representatives who will have a role in training the tenant commands on policies governing transgender troops.

A spokeswoman [?] for Naval Personnel Command, Lt. Jessica Anderson, told in an email that a commander’s tool kit is being developed to guide training, and that additional information about what these training sessions will include will be available in a future message to the fleet.

“Service members are expected to maintain standards of conduct and treat each other with dignity and respect,” she said. “Training for sailors will be conducted by command triads via mobile training teams or DVD with a facilitation guide if the unit is in a remote area and unable to receive face-to-face training. There will also be webinars for COs to ask questions prior to delivering training to their commands.”

According to the message, DVDs and discussion guides will be mailed to each unit, along with copies of the commander’s tool kit and a Defense Department guide being created to explain policy. The webinars, made available to leadership teams, will be provided after mobile training team visits as an opportunity for subject matter experts to answer any remaining questions before fleet training begins.

All sailors will have completed a training session on the new policies by July 1, 2017, Anderson said. That’s when the services plan to begin accepting transgender recruits for the first time.

Along with permitting transgender troops to serve openly, the military is creating procedures for troops to change their “gender marker” in the administrative Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System, and laying out rules to govern how troops might undergo medical gender transitions while in uniform.

Transgender troops will be required to use the bathroom and berthing facilities associated with their preferred gender, Navy officials have said.

And service leaders will be on alert for those who seek to single out or mistreat their transgender counterparts.

“We do not tolerate harassment of any kind,” Anderson said. “Treating all service members with dignity and respect is something we take extremely seriously, and when there are any indications that those values are not being followed, we will conduct appropriate investigations and take action as necessary.”

I served in the Navy for six years during the 2000’s, and it was getting bad then. Now, the military is overrun by feminists, foreigners, and freaks.

Frankly, I would rather see the United States pummeled in a major war than continue on like this. I’d rather shine the boots of the conquering Chinese soldiers, or listen to the Muslim call to prayer every day of every year, than to see my descendants corrupted under the rule of these emasculating egalitarian snakes.

Call me a traitor if you want. But this government no longer represents me and my kind. It is an occupying force as alien and hostile as any foreign power. The real traitors are those who embrace this society.

Even if Trump wins in November, I don’t see him overturning this nonsense. He doesn’t have a problem with sexual deviation.

The only hope for those who still uphold traditional Christian morality, who want our nations to survive intact for centuries to come, is the fact that this Evil Empire so grossly violates objective reality and promotes the most base and wicked parts of human nature that it cannot stand for long. Soviet Communism looks absolutely practical compared to the rotten, sterile “equality” of the West.

The sooner this reprobate society comes tumbling down, the better.


ConcussusThankless takers, self-absorbed half-wits, hunched over their little screens. The centers of fake universes six inches wide.

Insulated layabouts, seven-steps disconnected from toil and hardship and survival. How long could they live without their pre-packaged meals and their roadkill machines?

Bastards, literally Father-forgetting bastards, oblivious to the sources of their nourishment. Chemicals in the soil to grow the same unnatural crops again and again. Creatures raised and slaughtered in anonymity, ultimately stuffed between fat human cheeks without a word or thought of thanks or respect for the sacrifice of those simple lives.

May the glaciers march from the north and scrape the lifeless human fungus under their icy feet. May the cold, winter sun wither them away with its unrelenting stare. May the ants carry off every fleck of nourishment from their bleaching bones.

What vanity. Let them fall. Then disappear. Reduced to the dirt from which they sprang.

  • October 2016
    S M T W T F S
    « Sep    
%d bloggers like this: