When of one mind, Janus' views
form a composite of his two main sides. He attempts to consider issues with care and thoughtfulness, though he remains biased towards Christianity and Western
traditions. Outsiders might call him a Conservative, but in fact he is a Fundamentalist in that he promotes the Christian values that raised Western civilization to its peak.
One of the faces, looking to our right and called Patulcius, is the headstrong and determined side of Janus, tending to authoritarian ideals. Patulcius looks to history and upholds the traditions of
Christianity and Western civilization, and the well-being of Western nations. Patulcius sees world events as a struggle between divine and demonic
forces.
The other face—the easy-going, more open-minded, left-facing Clusivius—dislikes authority and prefers a more individualistic outlook. Clusivius looks to the future and contemplates changes. While
Christian, Clusivius takes an interest in the well-being of other civilizations as well as the Western. Clusivius tends to believe that elitist conspiracies play a major part in world events.
When possible, the complete Janus seeks to form a synthesis of the two sides when making a decision. At other times Janus allows any differences to stand without resolution. But now and again the two sides must battle one another until one side wins Janus' acceptance.
Tending to sensationalize, and sometimes to hyperbolize, C. F. van Niekerk over-analyzes any number of subjects from mundane minutiae to the great philosophical questions of life itself.
Katáxiros, the parched one, alone and adrift at sea, yet ever rowing ahead anyhow, sometimes weakly and sometimes vigorously, thirsting after God through the Orthodox Christian Church, contemplating the ways of the Lord, recognizing that while he is inadequate to the task, he must press ever ahead. Katáxiros writes about matters pertaining specifically to the Orthodox Church.
Barzillai Alpheus Bozarth claims to be a 19th Century man marooned in the 21st Century after a failed experiment in inter-dimensional travel. Not at all impressed with the wonders of our time, he would give just about anything to return to his beloved world of "horse manure and civilized etiquette". Barzillai writes historical observations and pores over old books and documents.
We don't know what to make of the Wanderer. He walks in with the moon and rolls out with the wind. He uses no name; the smells of rank sweat, dirt, and smoke mark him as much as anything. He's always near, but never close. Heedless of human ideals and bounds, he stands unyielding for honor on the ground. He's practical to a fault when he's not romantic to even greater fault. He says little, but when he does finally speak, we listen up. The Wanderer is our lawman of final resort. By hook or by crook, he sees a job done, just don't ask how. Frankly, we're a little afraid of the Wanderer.
Nature can be cruel to mankind.
If Concussus had his way, nature would be crueler yet. Concussus tends to arrive at the blackest of times, when humanity seems the most despicable.
Diabolus, the devil's advocate. Sometimes we are tempted to embrace the evil world that we despise. Diabolus is there to encourage us in this folly. Fortunately a rare visitor here.
– 12 September 2015 –
Patulcius:
British authorities are concerned that the invasive gray squirrel from North America will take over one of the last remaining red squirrel habitats in England, in Northumberland’s Kielder Forest on the border with Scotland. Yet somehow the British see no parallel between the invasive gray squirrels and the invasive immigrants who are rapidly displacing native Britons from their aboriginal lands. From the Telegraph:
Nick Mason, project manager for Red Squirrels Northern England, said until now Kielder had been a “very safe place for red squirrels”, with only “occasional sightings” of greys here and there near the forest.
The recent spate of sightings was “worrying”, he said, and conservationists are stepping up their efforts to try to protect the safe haven.
They have so far captured and killed all the greys that have been spotted in the forest and are expecting to secure new funding to bolster the defences as part of a £1.2 million grant announced on Friday from the Heritage Lottery Fund for red squirrel conservation nationwide.
Mr Mason said they planned to use the new cash next year to install 40 new motion-activated camera traps in remote parts of the woodland to detect squirrel movements as part of an “early warning system”.
They also plan to recruit up to 50 new volunteers to monitor the cameras for the grey infiltrators and either alert them when an animal is spotted or “find and kill it” themselves.
Mr Mason said volunteers were trained to kill the greys humanely, without using firearms. The main method used is live capture using cage traps.
“We decant the animal to a hessian sack and the animal is knocked on the head with a ‘priest’ – a little stick”, he explained.
That’s quite a bit of vigilance to protect a few thousand squirrels.
I don’t disapprove; unwanted invasive species ought to be eliminated if they threaten native species. That’s not even a controversial statement.
What is controversial, for some reason, is the desire of white nations to preserve their national integrity and heritage from invasive movements of people. These migrants should be treated humanely, but it must be made clear that we won’t let them move freely in our societies nor shall they stay for the long term.
Too bad the British don’t possess the will to make even half of the effort to save themselves as a distinct people that they have invested to thwart the spread of gray squirrels. Cameron’s feeble attempts to stave off bringing more than 20,000 refugees, for instance, is a token resistance that will likely crumble in the face of weak British resolve.
Too many Britons somehow have yet to see immigration as a threat. “We’re all just one human family, you know!”
Who knows if our peoples will ever wake up? If a tsunami of immigrants won’t do it, nothing will.
FINES ET INITIA 
Brittius
/ 12 September 2015Reblogged this on Brittius.
LikeLike
rogerunited
/ 12 September 2015I have actually seen an article very similar to this a few months ago. I’ve been trying to find it because the comments were classic!
LikeLike
rogerunited
/ 12 September 2015I wonder if somebody isn’t quietly signalling…
LikeLike
Janus
/ 15 September 2015I had thought to show an edited version of the article with “gray squirrels” changed to “illegal immigrants” and “red squirrels” to “Britons”, but I wondered if this might go too far: “Mr Mason said volunteers were trained to kill the illegals humanely, without using firearms. The main method used is live capture using cage traps.
“We decant the illegal immigrant to a hessian sack and the immigrant is knocked on the head with a ‘priest’ – a little stick”, he explained.”
It’s hard to say about signalling. But it’s easy to believe the British liberals see no irony here.
LikeLiked by 1 person
rogerunited
/ 16 September 2015I’m as anti-illegal alien as they come, but that’s a bit harsh even for me!
Kill them humanely WITHOUT USING A FIREARM. Why is it so important not to use a firearm? What could be more humane than a .22 in the brain?
LikeLike